From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Pallantla Poornima <pallantlax.poornima@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, reshma.pattan@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix sprintf with snprintf
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 12:04:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7th8defbzd.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549632457-15892-1-git-send-email-pallantlax.poornima@intel.com> (Pallantla Poornima's message of "Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:27:37 +0000")
Pallantla Poornima <pallantlax.poornima@intel.com> writes:
> sprintf function is not secure as it doesn't check the length of string.
> More secure function snprintf is used.
>
> Fixes: 727909c592 ("app/test: introduce dynamic commands list")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Pallantla Poornima <pallantlax.poornima@intel.com>
> ---
> test/test/commands.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/test/commands.c b/test/test/commands.c
> index 94fbc310e..5aeb35498 100644
> --- a/test/test/commands.c
> +++ b/test/test/commands.c
> @@ -367,6 +367,8 @@ int commands_init(void)
> struct test_command *t;
> char *commands, *ptr;
> int commands_len = 0;
> + int total_written = 0;
> + int count = 0;
>
> TAILQ_FOREACH(t, &commands_list, next) {
> commands_len += strlen(t->command) + 1;
> @@ -378,7 +380,10 @@ int commands_init(void)
>
> ptr = commands;
> TAILQ_FOREACH(t, &commands_list, next) {
> - ptr += sprintf(ptr, "%s#", t->command);
> + count = snprintf(ptr, commands_len - total_written - 1, "%s#",
> + t->command);
> + ptr += count;
This code is wrong. From the manpage:
Upon successful completion, the snprintf() function shall return
the number of bytes that would be written to s had n been
sufficiently large excluding the terminating null byte.
This code you've placed will improperly increment the number of bytes
taken, since you don't actually check it.
Additionally, the correct size is calculated in the preceeding blocks,
and then the appropriately sized block is allocated. It doesn't make
any sense to make the change this way.
If you are intent on changing this code, I suggest something like the
following (completely untested code). The rte_xsprintf() function can
be used in other areas where you're proposing these refactors (but again
see my earlier comments about whether these are actual concerns, or just
'I dislike the sprintf call').
---
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_string_fns.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_string_fns.h
index 9a2a1ff90..3554c496a 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_string_fns.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_string_fns.h
@@ -98,6 +98,41 @@ rte_strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t size)
ssize_t
rte_strscpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t dsize);
+/* Find a better place for this? */
+#define ALWAYS_ASSERT(expr) \
+ if (!(expr)) rte_panic("Assert failed: %s", #expr)
+
+/**
+ * Allocates an appropriately sized string and fills it with
+ * formatted output. Aborts if no memory can be allocated.
+ *
+ * @param fmt
+ * The format string. See the documentation for printf
+ * for valid format strings.
+ *
+ * @return
+ * A string filled with formatted output. Caller must release
+ * this memory with a call to free().
+ */
+static inline char *
+rte_xsprintf(const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ va_list args,args2;
+ size_t needed;
+ char *result;
+
+ va_start(args, fmt);
+ va_copy(args2, args);
+ needed = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, args);
+ result = malloc(needed+1);
+ ALWAYS_ASSERT(result != NULL);
+ vsnprintf(result, needed+1, fmt, args2);
+ va_end(args2);
+ va_end(args);
+
+ return result;
+}
+
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
diff --git a/test/test/commands.c b/test/test/commands.c
index 94fbc310e..eba96b9c9 100644
--- a/test/test/commands.c
+++ b/test/test/commands.c
@@ -365,24 +365,19 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
int commands_init(void)
{
struct test_command *t;
- char *commands, *ptr;
- int commands_len = 0;
+ char *ptr = NULL, *old;
TAILQ_FOREACH(t, &commands_list, next) {
- commands_len += strlen(t->command) + 1;
- }
-
- commands = malloc(commands_len + 1);
- if (!commands)
- return -1;
+ if (!ptr) {
+ ptr = xprintf("%s", t->command);
+ continue;
+ }
- ptr = commands;
- TAILQ_FOREACH(t, &commands_list, next) {
- ptr += sprintf(ptr, "%s#", t->command);
+ old = ptr;
+ ptr = xprintf("%s#%s", old, t->command);
+ free(old);
}
- ptr--;
- ptr[0] = '\0';
- cmd_autotest_autotest.string_data.str = commands;
+ cmd_autotest_autotest.string_data.str = ptr;
return 0;
}
---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-08 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 13:27 Pallantla Poornima
2019-02-08 14:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-02-08 16:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-08 17:04 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2019-02-08 17:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7th8defbzd.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=pallantlax.poornima@intel.com \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).