From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE6BA0507; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:12:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9545E415D7; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:12:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3726410E3 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 22:12:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1651263172; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9kZhzrPVRRG0M3xpPfG3whjUtg2xCxs9A5wxYjev36M=; b=Hu78bSXhcBlZKAGF5DDEQXc2+q55Ly+pgEjrI1nujGoH2rNtsm7+jg0j8TMIe9fQ1RQhRP Quq6tj0yMCjRIDQHGp+OnzjtXVKP2XNM7v4+Bl/EFj5LvapmYka5U4HTTrRQssle0/kQXQ FgOT5kMZ2mO3ObHSAUPuei/U+ikxUiE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-392-jc5SuJpPOdWlt6x7Aznm-g-1; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:12:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: jc5SuJpPOdWlt6x7Aznm-g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52123803524; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTPC1VM0NT (unknown [10.22.17.196]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A3C1416385; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:12:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: David Marchand , dev , Michael Santana , "thomas@monjalon.net" , nd Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: do not dump error logs in GHA containers References: <20220426070916.532-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:12:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Honnappa Nagarahalli's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2022 04:16:23 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.10 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Honnappa Nagarahalli writes: > > >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 5:05 PM Aaron Conole >> wrote: >> > > >> > > TBH, I did not test Travis by lack of interest (plus I don't want to >> > > be bothered with their ui / credit stuff). >> > > We could consider dropping Travis in the near future. >> > > >> > > Opinions? >> > >> > I think it makes sense. We haven't had travis reports in a while >> > because their credit system made it impossible to use. We had kept it >> > around for users of travis, but at this point, I think most people >> > have migrated to GHA. >> > >> >> Honnappa, do you see an issue if we stop maintaining the Travis configuration >> in the DPDK repo? > I do not see much of an issue from Arm side. The machines in the UNH lab provide the cover. > > I am wondering that this might still be useful for individual > developers who I believe are not affected by the Travis's credit > system (I am not sure on this). I don't use travis now that GHA "just works" for my private repositories. I would guess most developers will prefer GHA anyway. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> David Marchand