From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84433A054A; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:03:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BADB1CC3CE; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:03:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D891CC344 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:02:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1613052178; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=n09UWRX4icbVRGXGCjmwZ1exE1LuwxN8BjCIXYOO07g=; b=BRSdyn2Wa0BOPr34zr800cKTQcFIwGWVStCRt0SZqRX+70aevCJb0t6Z5YYeNYaNIqdSOZ 1YsraYIC3qycatX6zLwFumCQQngeR5MfBu664+a2JUNxF4kS5JxsawCHGuWSyS88QN41L9 3XH4Wkoz/BUXadAMOjZ4KW3JCltnyPw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-392-e8Z8pH6mOeaFBSAH6jQ6nA-1; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:02:46 -0500 X-MC-Unique: e8Z8pH6mOeaFBSAH6jQ6nA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6A2801965; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-114-243.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CAE860657; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:02:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> Cc: "Zawadzki\, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>, Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>, "dpdklab\@iol.unh.edu" <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>, "ci\@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>, "dev\@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "spdk\@lists.01.org" <spdk@lists.01.org> References: <f7ta6se7fh7.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> <DM6PR11MB4220733693776AA1B8BE91A9EE8F9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOE1vsPC-D-5Rnc08fJDqrpcjeK1oYbaPsp1B72h2Pueyby0TA@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR11MB422097059AB558056B97BEC5EE8F9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <f7th7ml5l6o.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> <CAOeXdva_KdVOqmVTWaECKTRRgWpXjX+_RuT6d5vFB5FGy3DhCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOeXdvZrTJu0bCoe8hXEGqDRDwJ-PBZcrbjg723M6TxSB1mw1w@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:02:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <CAOeXdvZrTJu0bCoe8hXEGqDRDwJ-PBZcrbjg723M6TxSB1mw1w@mail.gmail.com> (Brandon Lo's message of "Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:54:36 -0500") Message-ID: <f7tk0re1z4a.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> writes: > Hi again everyone, > > I have checked the pipelines with SPDK branch v21.01.x on the main DPDK branch. > It still seems to have an issue with compilation, and I have attached > a log of a Fedora SPDK compilation. > There are some undefined references to "rte_ether_unformat_addr" > I will continue to look into this. If you have any ideas on how to fix > this, please let me know. Looks like rte_ethdev depends on rte_net - maybe I missed something. Brandon, can we disable this test for the time being since it's been failing for a while now? Can you also send me the container image / definitions you're using so that I can help work on this? > Thanks, > Brandon > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:07 AM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I will adjust the branches and watch over the first few pipelines to >> make sure everything goes smoothly. >> >> Thanks for the update, >> Brandon >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > "Zawadzki, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> writes: >> > >> > > Hi Lincoln, >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x. >> > > >> > >> > Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even from a few >> > hours ago). I suppose the lab side might need some adjustment, too? >> > >> > > >> > > The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against >> > > dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if >> > > this is what you are seeing on your end too. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Tomek >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> >> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM >> > > To: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> >> > > Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Brandon Lo >> > > <blo@iol.unh.edu>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; >> > > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org >> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks Tomek, >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure >> > > the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure >> > > is. :-P >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Lincoln >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi Aaron, >> > > >> > > Thank you for reporting this ! >> > > >> > > This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which was resolved on latest SPDK. >> > > >> > > I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK >> > > branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK >> > > release, would be v21.01.x: >> > > https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x >> > > >> > > The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged shortly: >> > > https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320 >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Tomek >> > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Aaron Conole >> > > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM >> > > > To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> >> > > > Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org >> > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab >> > > > >> > > > Greetings, >> > > > >> > > > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community lab seems >> > > > to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the failure. >> > > > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a symbol that isn't >> > > > available when linking. >> > > > >> > > > Job details (for example): >> > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results- >> > > > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_file/20 >> > > > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip >> > > > >> > > > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the compilation of >> > > > SPDK? Maybe show the arguments to the compiler for the specific object? >> > > > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > -Aaron >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> Brandon Lo >> >> UNH InterOperability Laboratory >> >> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 >> >> blo@iol.unh.edu >> >> www.iol.unh.edu