From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBABA09E4; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:22:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06624067B; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:22:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF6440395 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:22:09 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611951728; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mNTrvc13npVxzC1A8hP6mQ1hF0aismQzVpGLAhbyGPo=; b=WaKPinm/nzm5MzVUgJG2b14KRYbPJRi9Lx66jNA0SBysWgFJ9ndgJ6fE0acn1kXIj5Aew9 cMMoMhf/hIp62YKBC//6DHwslpklolzFbc/RniH4/UY38lmaLaIi8pEPwFNxGusqY7kk6r 73H6tlBca/Qn80g0R1u2rOXjmGnu0pU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-573-WJYvoyUNPGigKbFWGyNdwA-1; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:22:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: WJYvoyUNPGigKbFWGyNdwA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 957BF59; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-114-243.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312C26267E; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:22:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org References: <20210127174255.1671738-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:22:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210127174255.1671738-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> (Bruce Richardson's message of "Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:42:55 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: allow taking test names from commandline X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Bruce Richardson writes: > While having the ability to run a test based off the DPDK_TEST environment > variable is useful, it's often easier to specify the test name as a > commandline parameter to a test binary. This also allows the test runs to > be saved as part of the shell cmdline history. > > This patch adds support for checking all parameters after the EAL ones, and > running all valid autotests requested - either from DPDK_TEST or on the > commandline. This also allows multiple tests to be run in a single > automated session, which is useful for working with components which have > multiple test suites. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson > --- LGTM, and I think it can be useful for running specific tests when developers make changes. Acked-by: Aaron Conole