From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B015582 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 21:19:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B70B07D0C8; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25-97.bos.redhat.com (dhcp-25-172.bos.redhat.com [10.18.25.172]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u5RJJkvO030204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:19:47 -0400 From: Aaron Conole To: Yuanhan Liu Cc: "Loftus\, Ciara" , "dev\@dpdk.org" , "Xie\, Huawei" , Christian Ehrhardt References: <1466177556-14891-1-git-send-email-aconole@redhat.com> <20160621072128.GK23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <87r3bqn0o8.fsf@trashheap.bytheb.org> <20160624023105.GS23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <74F120C019F4A64C9B78E802F6AD4CC24F8E0AA7@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com> <20160624075103.GT23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <87lh1uai7b.fsf@trashheap.bytheb.org> <20160627115356.GX23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:19:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160627115356.GX23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (Yuanhan Liu's message of "Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:53:56 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] librte_vhost: Add unix domain socket fd registration X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:19:49 -0000 Yuanhan Liu writes: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:23:52AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: >> Is there still merit to this patch, given above? If so, I'd finish my >> integration and testing work and submit it formally. > > Sorry, I don't see the strong need of this patch (at least so far), > judging that vhost-user as the client could solve the issue your > patch meant to resolve. Okay, thanks so much for the review and consideration, Yuanhan! -Aaron