From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A01A0559; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:13:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819B02BF9; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:13:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D81FEB for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:13:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1584368014; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h6Wx4iEQfG2oFCIQ99plQH512k5W2PJMutqKnRLQPd0=; b=LzoIRpdMQvMA44742TWoNktBl/oeFs2XOgERpw6YWB3g2qjTMImhSFJWEBKC5uFaQ+ZaQz ae8XmpYYqNoDgqLzbKn/ZQdfc+dJ+ObcHEOtZHWnhphqdsjgbBoVADEUqtkPp6ty5g3jMj tSdQox8sMbPK303VHlac5E4KvJb7iTw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-475-Gy3zFeaaMh-YUJARgwNJJg-1; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:13:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Gy3zFeaaMh-YUJARgwNJJg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279D4107ACCA; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-124-179.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.124.179]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2250D5C1B2; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:13:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: David Marchand Cc: Ruifeng Wang , Michael Santana , Bruce Richardson , "Ananyev\, Konstantin" , Cristian Dumitrescu , "Wang\, Yipeng1" , "Gobriel\, Sameh" , dev , "Burakov\, Anatoly" , Gavin Hu , Honnappa Nagarahalli , juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech, nd References: <20200225073236.135581-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20200313081614.195335-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:13:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (David Marchand's message of "Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:54:25 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] no-huge unit test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" David Marchand writes: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 2:04 PM Aaron Conole wrote: >> >> Aaron Conole writes: >> >> > Ruifeng Wang writes: >> > >> >> For environments (such as containers) where hugetlbfs are not availab= le, >> >> some unit tests can be run with 'no-huge' option. >> >> >> >> fast-tests suites is generated dynamically according to hugetlbfs >> >> availability in building environment. This allows unit test to run >> >> in different environments using the same suite name. >> >> >> >> Several test cases are fixed to be able to run in no-huge mode. >> > >> > This looks great! Thanks, Ruifeng. >> > >> > I'm going to ack it once I see it run under the robot :) >> >> Just looking through the robot's run, it seems that on the statically >> linked Arm64 build, the disk quota is getting exceeded. Do we need to >> request some more disk quota for this somehow? Is the build getting too >> large? > > It seems to repeat. > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/297840285#L2975 Yes. > Do you know how much space we have in travis? Suppposedly we have 18G on that container... :-/ > Is the (c?)cache getting too big? > You can find out the per job cache size via the travis cli. When using the travis CLI: $ travis cache no caches found I know this must be untrue, but it seems to not want to send me details on my system. I tried going through the API, but the largest cache file I see is 200M, so I must be misunderstanding something.