From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9B6A0588; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:08:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74071DB11; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:08:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288211DAFF for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:08:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587056903; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/rLg9ZGZipZD/0VIqOyAshWJm/U30LkCwwwDAb9I8KU=; b=fMyCyxoPCW2YBI9+LPDxPNUqyiYeY+52ZMu+1SKdVSlLjp/xg0MaQFbgw+c1yKvpICmL7j LNmHFPE1APlI16nAGQ0bUFrgx1VQJByyK8rvs5ItIL76X5QyQLvwxw5sUVuBrYKFp2iLLO f9r+qDjIOO5ZCicO9RDK4d+TOlUhWF4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-95-nJfX41jiMHKctcdhvKjkQw-1; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:08:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nJfX41jiMHKctcdhvKjkQw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284FC107ACCC; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-116-136.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.136]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC0B5DA2C; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:08:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: "thomas\@monjalon.net" , David Marchand , dev , Ruifeng Wang , Gavin Hu , Michael Santana , nd References: <20200416110053.2547791-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <4760008.eFTFzoEnKi@thomas> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:08:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Honnappa Nagarahalli's message of "Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:55:01 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Honnappa Nagarahalli writes: > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs >>=20 >> 16/04/2020 15:45, Aaron Conole: >> > David Marchand writes: >> > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Aaron Conole >> wrote: >> > >> Thomas Monjalon writes: >> > >> >> > >> > Travis is not reliable for native Arm and PPC: >> > >> > https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619/6 > Thanks David for creating the ticket. Will escalate this through our > contacts at Travis CI, hopefully it can be resolved soon. I did get an email from someone at travis support acknowledging the issue and saying that they are working on it. >> > >> > >> > >> > In order to get reliable Travis reports, the use of Arm machines >> > >> > is removed until Travis fixes it. >> > >> > >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon >> > >> > --- >> > >> >> > >> We should add back the cross-build if we do this - at least then we >> > >> could have a reliable compilation test of Arm64 code. Does it mak= e >> > >> sense? >> > > >> > > I don't see them removed by this patch, the two jobs are still prese= nt ? >> > >> > Whoops - for some reason I missed them. Nevermind :) >>=20 >> So? Acked? >>=20 >>=20 >>=20