From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BA01B1F2 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 04:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Oct 2017 19:15:41 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,482,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="907249378" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.241.225.33]) ([10.241.225.33]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2017 19:15:40 -0700 To: Zhiyong Yang <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>, Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>, Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com> References: <20170925032231.72897-1-zhiyong.yang@intel.com> <20170929071727.21618-1-zhiyong.yang@intel.com> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Message-ID: <f8625d3d-1b96-f72e-13c2-74e5bbc3c45a@intel.com> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:15:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170929071727.21618-1-zhiyong.yang@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/5] increase port_id range X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 02:15:43 -0000 On 9/29/2017 8:17 AM, Zhiyong Yang wrote: > port_id is currently defined as uint8_t, which is limited to the range > 0 to 255. A larger range is required for vdev scalability. > > It is necessary for a redefinition of port_id to extend it from > 1 bytes to 2 bytes. All ethdev APIs and usages related to port_id will > be changed at the same time. > > Discussion about port_id is the following thread. > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/23208/ > > Changes in V2: > 1. cover more PMDs to increase port_id range. > 2. cover more examples to increase port_id range. > 3. add 17.11 release note. > > Changes in V3: > 1. cover mlx4 and mlx5. > 2. add to increase port_id range in test code. > 3. The patch "librte_mbuf: modify port initialization value" is merged > into the patchset. > > Changes in V4: > 1. Add a patch to remove bonding APIs using ABI versioning according to > Ferruh's comments. > 2. Unify to use typedef portid_t in testpmd code. > 3. update release note deprecation doc in 2/5 > 4. fix some issues according to comments. > > Changes in V5: > 1. For 1/5, bond_mode_8023ad_conf_get_v1708() and bond_mode_8023ad_conf > _get() are merged into one function bond_mode_8023ad_conf_get. > > Changes in V6: > 1. For 2/5, remove the unnecessary LIBABIVER in Makefile and update > the release notes "Shared Library Versions". > Note: The patchset have dependency on the following patch. > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28738/ > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/29219/ > > Note: 3/5 and 4/5 patches' building depends on 2/5 patch since 2/5 patch > breaks lib/PMD API/ABI. > > Zhiyong Yang (5): > net/bonding: remove bonding APIs using ABI versioning > ethdev: increase port_id range > examples: increase port_id range > test: increase port_id range > librte_mbuf: modify port initialization value Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. There was merge conflict for: rte_eth_bond_pmd.c failsafe_private.h mlx5_rxtx.h Maintainers of these files cc'ed, can you please double check latest files in next-net?