From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA39A045E for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 12:10:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B771B951; Thu, 30 May 2019 12:10:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D332C55; Thu, 30 May 2019 12:10:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3158C09AD11; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.230] (ovpn-117-230.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.230]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C18C1001E77; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:10:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Traynor To: "dev@dpdk.org" , "stable@dpdk.org" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 11:10:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Thu, 30 May 2019 10:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-dev] Short term stable branches/releases X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi All, A reminder that there is no longer a default in practice of having short term stable branches/releases for xx.02/05/08 DPDK master releases. Note, this is relevant for xx.02/05/08 based short term (~3 month) stables only. DPDK LTS based off xx.11 is *not* changing. This is to allow more time for maintenance and validation of master and LTS branches/releases as it seems to be where the community are most interested. There can still be short term stable branches/releases for individual xx.02/05/08 releases if there is a particular need and a commitment from community members to maintain/validate. See http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/stable.html#stable-releases for further details. thanks, Kevin.