From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E0EA04BC; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 13:55:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E140A1BEC9; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 13:55:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AF31BE8C; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 13:55:25 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: FPTfdfSg9f7tL7UHSkp/pW19VhhvmgoM+9DxM+eootjEcSXDkEmbCY+72nuo7JbB/sKD0sw8kd FNSUQO8CIa0Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9767"; a="182748305" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,350,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="182748305" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Oct 2020 04:55:23 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 6foY0eet/Oqt08somsTDq08AediqxfUXb9/jl2Nz7HUPFUo/3+Vqvc7ook9BMusIC1WQ6r7m76 4tNWMxKqJ2pw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,350,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="312188335" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.226.103]) ([10.213.226.103]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Oct 2020 04:55:22 -0700 To: Ciara Loftus , dev@dpdk.org References: <20201008091729.4321-1-ciara.loftus@intel.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Cc: "techboard@dpdk.org" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:55:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201008091729.4321-1-ciara.loftus@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/af_xdp: Don't allow umem sharing for xsks with same netdev, qid X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/8/2020 10:17 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote: > Supporting this would require locks, which would impact the performance of > the more typical cases - xsks with different qids and netdevs. > > Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus > Fixes: 74b46340e2d4 ("net/af_xdp: support shared UMEM") Off the topic. This is the patch 80000 in patchwork! This was fast. Thanks to everyone who contributed! https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/80000/ The historical numbers from DPDK patchwork: 80000 - Oct. 8, 2020 (153 days) [ 5 months / 21 weeks and 6 days ] 70000 - May 8, 2020 (224 days) 60000 - Sept. 27, 2019 (248 days) 50000 - Jan. 22, 2019 (253 days) 40000 - May 14, 2018 (217 days) 30000 - Oct. 9, 2017 (258 days) 20000 - Jan. 25, 2017 (372 days) 10000 - Jan. 20, 2016 (645 days) 00001 - April 16, 2014 This is the fastest 10K of patches, the average ~250 days for 10K patch seems passed by 100 days. v20.11 being ABI break release must have helped it but meanwhile the big difference may mean project is still growing. Just to put into another perspective, this means continuous 65 patches in average each day for last a few months. Thanks again to all contributors.