From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de>
Received: from smail.rz.tu-ilmenau.de (smail.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.186.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F602C15
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  1 Sep 2017 00:05:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [141.24.212.108] (thunderstorm.prakinf.tu-ilmenau.de
 [141.24.212.108])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by smail.rz.tu-ilmenau.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9F5D5802A9;
 Fri,  1 Sep 2017 00:05:35 +0200 (CEST)
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
References: <1503337872-14325-2-git-send-email-markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de>
 <1503408514-20079-1-git-send-email-markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de>
 <231558aa-0a93-bdf7-30a5-dc547212e4e9@intel.com>
From: Markus Theil <markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de>
Organization: TU Ilmenau
Message-ID: <fc6a9dff-89fb-25cf-f24d-3d912d664179@tu-ilmenau.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 00:05:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <231558aa-0a93-bdf7-30a5-dc547212e4e9@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] igb_uio: MSI IRQ mode,
 irq enable/disable refactored
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:05:37 -0000

On 30.08.2017 18:32, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> Please add fall back comment: /* fall back to MSI */
>
> And related this fallback, previously flow was:
> Try MSIX, if fails try legacy.
>
> Now it is:
> Try MSIX, if fails try MSI, if fails try legacy.
>
> Do you think, does this new step included may break anyone's out that
> would expect to fallback to legacy? (although I don't expect, I believe=

> good to sound it)
>
I also don't expect it, but can't say it with 100% certainty of course.