From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>,
Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Cc: andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, liuyonglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] app/testpmd: fix unnecessary change when set tunnel TSO
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 03:37:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcc7104e-9b16-4c88-a836-92bad98017e6@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231110081925.14142-4-lihuisong@huawei.com>
On 11/10/2023 8:19 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
> Currently, there are two conditions to set tunnel TSO, like "parse tunnel"
> and "outer IP checksum". If these conditions are not satisfied, testpmd
> should not change their configuration, like tx_offloads on port and per
> queue, and no need to request "reconfig device".
>
> Fixes: 597f9fafe13b ("app/testpmd: convert to new Tx offloads API")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> index d3243d016b..33e66d1d93 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -5093,17 +5093,6 @@ cmd_tunnel_tso_set_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> res->port_id);
> return;
> }
> - check_tunnel_tso_nic_support(res->port_id, dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
> - }
> -
> - if (ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz == 0) {
> - ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &= ~all_tunnel_tso;
> - printf("TSO for tunneled packets is disabled\n");
> - } else {
> - ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads |=
> - (all_tunnel_tso & dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
> - printf("TSO segment size for tunneled packets is %d\n",
> - ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz);
>
> /* Below conditions are needed to make it work:
> * (1) tunnel TSO is supported by the NIC;
> @@ -5116,14 +5105,29 @@ cmd_tunnel_tso_set_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> * is not necessary for IPv6 tunneled pkts because there's no
> * checksum in IP header anymore.
> */
> -
> - if (!ports[res->port_id].parse_tunnel)
> + if (!ports[res->port_id].parse_tunnel) {
> fprintf(stderr,
> - "Warning: csum parse_tunnel must be set so that tunneled packets are recognized\n");
> + "Error: csum parse_tunnel must be set so that tunneled packets are recognized\n");
> + return;
> + }
> if (!(ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &
> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM))
> + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM)) {
> fprintf(stderr,
> - "Warning: csum set outer-ip must be set to hw if outer L3 is IPv4; not necessary for IPv6\n");
> + "Error: csum set outer-ip must be set to hw if outer L3 is IPv4; not necessary for IPv6\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + check_tunnel_tso_nic_support(res->port_id, dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
> + }
> +
> + if (ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz == 0) {
> + ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &= ~all_tunnel_tso;
> + printf("TSO for tunneled packets is disabled\n");
> + } else {
> + ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads |=
> + (all_tunnel_tso & dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
> + printf("TSO segment size for tunneled packets is %d\n",
> + ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz);
>
Similar comment with previous patch, why having separate if block for
same check, above block can be merged to it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-11 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-10 8:19 [PATCH v1 0/3] app/testpmd: fix the command to " Huisong Li
2023-11-10 8:19 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] app/testpmd: fix random value " Huisong Li
2023-11-10 11:42 ` Ivan Malov
2023-11-11 1:17 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-11 3:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-11-10 8:19 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] app/testpmd: add the explicit check for tunnel TSO offload Huisong Li
2023-11-11 3:30 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-11-11 4:27 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-10 8:19 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] app/testpmd: fix unnecessary change when set tunnel TSO Huisong Li
2023-11-11 3:37 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2023-11-11 4:28 ` lihuisong (C)
2023-11-11 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] app/testpmd: fix the command to " Huisong Li
2023-11-11 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] app/testpmd: fix random value " Huisong Li
2023-11-11 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] app/testpmd: add the explicit check for tunnel TSO offload Huisong Li
2023-11-11 4:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] app/testpmd: fix unnecessary change when set tunnel TSO Huisong Li
2023-11-11 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] app/testpmd: fix the command to " Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcc7104e-9b16-4c88-a836-92bad98017e6@amd.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).