DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
To: "Robin Jarry" <rjarry@redhat.com>,
	"Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Cc: "Heng Wang" <heng.wang@ericsson.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"Jack Bond-Preston" <jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com>,
	"David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"Chengwen Feng" <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/7] buildtools/chkincs: relax C linkage requirement
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 09:31:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd233fbb-3666-42a2-97a4-02aafb249a41@lysator.liu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D4MBO3TESLI4.GEJ8YKSLMRQ6@redhat.com>

On 2024-10-03 18:47, Robin Jarry wrote:
> Mattias Rönnblom, Sep 20, 2024 at 12:47:
>> Relax chkincs requirement of all DPDK header files having to contain
>> 'extern "C"'.
>>
>> Instructing a C++ toolchain to use C linkage is only necessarily if the
>> header file declares symbols (i.e., functions or global variables).
>>
>> With this change, chkincs tries to find if any functions or references
>> to global variables are declared in the header file, and if not, no C
>> linkage is required.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> PATCH v11:
>>  * Detect functions from the Windows POSIX wrappers, to avoid false
>>    positives for redundant 'extern "C"'.
>> ---
> 
> Hi Mattias,
> 
> I have some remarks on this script. Please see below:
> 
>>  buildtools/chkincs/chkextern.py | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  buildtools/chkincs/meson.build  | 14 +++---
>>  2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100755 buildtools/chkincs/chkextern.py
>>
>> diff --git a/buildtools/chkincs/chkextern.py b/buildtools/chkincs/ 
>> chkextern.py
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 0000000000..5374ce1c72
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/buildtools/chkincs/chkextern.py
>> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
>> +#! /usr/bin/env python3
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> +# Copyright(c) 2024 Ericsson AB
>> +
>> +import sys
>> +import re
>> +
>> +def strip_cpp(header):
>> +    no_cpp = ""
>> +    header = header.replace("\\\n", " ")
>> +
>> +    for line in header.split("\n"):
>> +        if re.match(r'^\s*#.*', line) is None and len(line) > 0:
>> +            no_cpp += "%s\n" % line
>> +
>> +    return no_cpp
>> +
>> +
>> +def strip_comments(header):
>> +    no_c_comments = re.sub(r'/\*.*?\*/', '', header, flags=re.DOTALL)
>> +    no_cxx_comments = re.sub(r'//.*', '', no_c_comments)
>> +    return no_cxx_comments
>> +
>> +
>> +def strip(header):
>> +    header = strip_comments(header)
>> +    header = strip_cpp(header)
>> +    return header
> 
> None of these three strip* functions are used.
> 

Oops.

I think I'll just remove the strip_cpp() function (not sure why I 
thought that was ever needed). strip_comments() may be somewhat useful 
when looking for the 'extern "C"' string, if for some reason that string 
would be in a comment somewhere.

>> +
>> +
>> +def has_extern_c(header):
>> +    return header.find('extern "C"') != -1
>> +
>> +
>> +def has_vars(header):
>> +    return re.search(r'^extern\s+[a-z0-9_]+\s.*;', header, 
>> flags=re.MULTILINE) is not None
>> +
>> +
>> +FUNCTION_RES = [
>> +    r'rte_[a-z0-9_]+\(',
>> +    r'cmdline_[a-z0-9_]+\(',
>> +    r'vt100_[a-z0-9_]+\(',
>> +    r'rdline_[a-z0-9_]+\(',
>> +    r'cirbuf_[a-z0-9_]+\(',
>> +    # Windows UNIX compatibility
>> +    r'pthread_[a-z0-9_]+\(',
>> +    r'regcomp\(',
>> +    r'count_cpu\('
>> +]
>> +
>> +
>> +def has_functions(header):
>> +    for function_re in FUNCTION_RES:
>> +        if re.search(function_re, header) is not None:
>> +            return True
>> +    return False
>> +
>> +
>> +def has_symbols(header):
>> +    return has_functions(header) or has_vars(header)
>> +
>> +
>> +def chk_missing(filename):
>> +    header = open(filename).read()
> 
> with open(filename) as f:
>     header = f.read()
> 

What benefit would that construct be to this program?

>> +    if has_symbols(header) and not has_extern_c(header):
>> +        print(filename)
>> +
>> +
>> +def chk_redundant(filename):
>> +    header = open(filename).read()
> 
> with open(filename) as f:
>     header = f.read()
> 
>> +    if not has_symbols(header) and has_extern_c(header):
>> +        print(filename)
> 
> Can we rename these functions to check_missing and check_redundant? I 
> don't think the abbreviation is needed here.
> 

Sure.

(The function name was derived from the script name, which in turn got 
its name inspired by chkincs "tool" (directory) name.)

>> +
>> +if len(sys.argv) < 3:
>> +    print("%s missing|redundant <header-file> ..." % sys.argv[0])
>> +    sys.exit(1)
>> +
>> +op = sys.argv[1]
>> +headers = sys.argv[2:]
>> +
>> +for header in headers:
>> +    if op == 'missing':
>> +        chk_missing(header)
>> +    elif op == 'redundant':
>> +        chk_redundant(header)
> 
> I don't see the 'redundant' op being used here.
> 

It's used a patch further down the set.

>> +    else:
>> +        print("Unknown operation.")
>> +        sys.exit(1)
> 
> I know it is a simple python script but it would be better to add a 
> proper main() function and use argparse to handle errors. E.g.:
> 
> def main():
>     parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__)
>     parser.add_argument("op", choices=("missing", "redundant"))
>     parser.add_argument("headers", nargs="+")
>     args = parser.parse_args()
> 
>     for h in args.headers:
>         if op == "missing":
>             chk_missing(h)
>         elif op == "redundant":
>             chk_redundant(h)
> 
> if __name__ == "__main__":
>     main()
> 
> 

I don't think you need to bring in the usual Python boiler plate. This 
script is not supposed to be invoked directly by a user - it's just an 
extension of the meson build scripts.

>> diff --git a/buildtools/chkincs/meson.build b/buildtools/chkincs/ 
>> meson.build
>> index f2dadcae18..762f85efe5 100644
>> --- a/buildtools/chkincs/meson.build
>> +++ b/buildtools/chkincs/meson.build
>> @@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ if not add_languages('cpp', required: false)
>>  endif
>>
>>  # check for extern C in files, since this is not detected as an error 
>> by the compiler
>> -grep = find_program('grep', required: false)
>> -if grep.found()
>> -    errlist = run_command([grep, '--files-without-match', '^extern 
>> "C"', dpdk_chkinc_headers],
>> -            check: false, capture: true).stdout().split()
>> -    if errlist != []
>> -        error('Files missing C++ \'extern "C"\' guards:\n- ' + '\n- 
>> '.join(errlist))
>> -    endif
>> +chkextern = find_program('chkextern.py')
>> +
>> +missing_extern_headers = run_command(chkextern, 'missing', 
>> dpdk_chkinc_headers,
>> +      capture: true, check: true).stdout().split()
>> +
>> +if missing_extern_headers != []
>> +    error('Files missing C++ \'extern "C"\' guards:\n- ' + '\n- 
>> '.join(missing_extern_headers))
> 
> Instead of just relying on this script output, it would be better if it 
> exited with a non-zero status when something is wrong. That way you 
> would not have to capture stdout at all and you could leave meson do the 
> work.
> 

Sure, but it would be required to invoke the script for every header 
file in the tree. Not sure I think that would be a net gain.

Thanks for the review.

>>  endif
>>
>>  gen_cpp_files = generator(gen_c_file_for_header,
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-04  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-31 13:13 [RFC v3] eal: add bitset type Mattias Rönnblom
2024-01-31 16:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-01-31 16:28   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-01-31 16:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-01-31 18:45   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-01  8:04     ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-02 10:19       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-02 12:42         ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-16 10:23 ` [RFC v4 1/4] " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-16 10:23   ` [RFC v4 2/4] eal: add bitset test suite Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-16 10:23   ` [RFC v4 3/4] service: use multi-word bitset to represent service flags Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-16 10:23   ` [RFC v4 4/4] event/dsw: optimize serving port logic Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05  7:33   ` [RFC v5 1/6] eal: add bitset type Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05  7:33     ` [RFC v5 2/6] eal: add bitset test suite Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05  7:33     ` [RFC v5 3/6] eal: add atomic bitset functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05  7:33     ` [RFC v5 4/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bitset operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05  7:33     ` [RFC v5 5/6] service: use multi-word bitset to represent service flags Mattias Rönnblom
2024-05-05  7:33     ` [RFC v5 6/6] event/dsw: optimize serving port logic Mattias Rönnblom
2024-08-09 20:14     ` [PATCH 1/6] eal: add bitset type Mattias Rönnblom
2024-08-09 20:14       ` [PATCH 2/6] eal: add bitset test suite Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12  4:51         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-09 20:14       ` [PATCH 3/6] eal: add atomic bitset functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12  4:51         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-09 20:14       ` [PATCH 4/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bitset operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12  4:52         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-09 20:14       ` [PATCH 5/6] service: use multi-word bitset to represent service flags Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12  4:52         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-09 20:14       ` [PATCH 6/6] event/dsw: add support for larger port count Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12  4:53         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-20 17:09       ` [PATCH 1/6] eal: add bitset type Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-02 13:55       ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-02 14:46         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-02 14:49         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12  4:51       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-09-17  9:36       ` [PATCH v7 0/6] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17  9:36         ` [PATCH v7 1/6] dpdk: do not force C linkage on include file dependencies Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48           ` [PATCH v8 0/6] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48             ` [PATCH v8 1/6] dpdk: do not force C linkage on include file dependencies Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18  9:04               ` [PATCH v9 0/6] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18  9:04                 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] dpdk: do not force C linkage on include file dependencies Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31                   ` [PATCH v10 0/7] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31                     ` [PATCH v10 1/7] buildtools/chkincs: relax C linkage requirement Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20  6:24                       ` [PATCH v11 0/7] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20  6:24                         ` [PATCH v11 1/7] buildtools/chkincs: relax C linkage requirement Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47                           ` [PATCH v12 0/7] Improve EAL bit operations API Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47                             ` [PATCH v12 1/7] buildtools/chkincs: relax C linkage requirement Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-03 16:47                               ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-04  7:31                                 ` Mattias Rönnblom [this message]
2024-10-04  8:05                                   ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-04  8:40                                     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-04 11:51                                       ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-04 12:19                                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-09-20 10:47                             ` [PATCH v12 2/7] dpdk: use C linkage only where appropriate Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47                             ` [PATCH v12 3/7] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47                             ` [PATCH v12 4/7] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47                             ` [PATCH v12 5/7] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47                             ` [PATCH v12 6/7] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20 10:47                             ` [PATCH v12 7/7] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20  6:24                         ` [PATCH v11 2/7] dpdk: use C linkage only where appropriate Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20  6:24                         ` [PATCH v11 3/7] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20  6:24                         ` [PATCH v11 4/7] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20  6:24                         ` [PATCH v11 5/7] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20  6:24                         ` [PATCH v11 6/7] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-20  6:24                         ` [PATCH v11 7/7] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31                     ` [PATCH v10 2/7] dpdk: use C linkage only where appropriate Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31                     ` [PATCH v10 3/7] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31                     ` [PATCH v10 4/7] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31                     ` [PATCH v10 5/7] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31                     ` [PATCH v10 6/7] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-19 19:31                     ` [PATCH v10 7/7] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18  9:04                 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18  9:04                 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18  9:04                 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18  9:04                 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-18  9:04                 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48             ` [PATCH v8 2/6] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48             ` [PATCH v8 3/6] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48             ` [PATCH v8 4/6] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48             ` [PATCH v8 5/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17 10:48             ` [PATCH v8 6/6] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17  9:36         ` [PATCH v7 2/6] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17  9:36         ` [PATCH v7 3/6] eal: add unit tests for bit operations Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17  9:36         ` [PATCH v7 4/6] eal: add atomic " Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17  9:36         ` [PATCH v7 5/6] eal: add unit tests for atomic bit access functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-17  9:36         ` [PATCH v7 6/6] eal: extend bitops to handle volatile pointers Mattias Rönnblom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd233fbb-3666-42a2-97a4-02aafb249a41@lysator.liu.se \
    --to=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=heng.wang@ericsson.com \
    --cc=jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).