DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
To: "Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	"Gavin.Hu@arm.com" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
	"yskoh@mellanox.com" <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Cc: "nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>,
	"russell@mellanox.com" <russell@mellanox.com>,
	 "mrosenbluth@mellanox.com" <mrosenbluth@mellanox.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Default cacheline size for ARM
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 09:05:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff666fd6b3e53158c2c5b3085d4f2af276b708ef.camel@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR08MB3672FC63330EB36AC97DBA76989C0@AM6PR08MB3672.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 05:50 +0000, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > The cacheline size (RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE) for ARM CPUs
> > > > > > > > is set
> > > > > > > > to be 128B by default. Mellanox's BlueField is an ARM
> > > > > > > > CPU
> > > > > > > > having
> > > > > > > > Cortex-A72
> > > > > > > > and its CL size is 64B.
> > > > > > Just wondering how many devices are out there with 128B
> > > > > > cache
> > > > > > line? I also have not heard about any future devices with
> > > > > > 128B
> > > > > > cache line. If the majority is 64B, why not keep 64B as the
> > > > > > default?
> > > > > 
> > > > > The problem is, In the armv8 spec the cache line size is
> > > > > IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED. Marvell's embedded processors has
> > > > > 128B
> > CL
> > > > > and Server processors has 64B CL.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Assuming the defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc will be used
> > > > > by
> > > > > distro folks then that configuration should support all the
> > > > > devices with
> > > > > armv8.1 spec. For instance, marvells new chips are armv8.2
> > > > > but we
> > > > > can not make that as default.
> > > > What will happen in the future when we will have v9, v10 etc? I
> > > > think the distro(generic/binary portable) config should get rid
> > > > of v8.
> > > 
> > > Will it be too much overhead if the image is same for v8, v9 and
> > > v10.
> > > I think, we can inline with what distro folks are doing for other
> > > packages, I think, DPDK package does not need any exception.
> > Yes, we need to be inline with any other package. My understanding
> > is that
> > the image will be same for v8,v9,v10 (any input from distro
> > engineers will
> > help here). So, my question is, should the config file/name used by
> > distros
> > contain anything specific to armv8?
> Jerin, after following [1], I am not unable to understand when the
> file config/arm/arm64_armv8_linuxapp_gcc gets used. Is this file
> required?

If I understand it correctly, only for cross compiling on x86.
distro folks build the generic image on arm64 with -Dmachine=default
for arm64.


> 
> 1. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-January/123272.html







  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-23  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-04 19:59 [dpdk-dev] " Yongseok Koh
2019-01-05  5:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-01-05 22:47   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-06  7:56     ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-01-14  7:47       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-14  8:05         ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-01-16  1:57           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-18  5:50             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-23  9:05               ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran [this message]
2019-01-23 16:28                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-28 12:56                   ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-01-31 18:09                     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-02-01 17:16                       ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff666fd6b3e53158c2c5b3085d4f2af276b708ef.camel@marvell.com \
    --to=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mrosenbluth@mellanox.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=russell@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).