DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Srisivasubramanian Srinivasan <ssrinivasan@caviumnetworks.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/liquidio: add support for 10GBase-T cards
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:23:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffa3a928-cab5-2562-2c90-c066d994630c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508954815.17549.22.camel@caviumnetworks.com>

On 10/25/2017 11:06 AM, Srisivasubramanian Srinivasan wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 10:49 -0700, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 10/23/2017 9:42 PM, Srisivasubramanian S wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Srisivasubramanian S <ssrinivasan at caviumnetworks.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton <shijith.thotton at caviumnetworks.com>
>>> ---
>>>  doc/guides/nics/liquidio.rst            |  2 ++
>>>  drivers/net/liquidio/base/lio_hw_defs.h | 12 ++++++++----
>>>  drivers/net/liquidio/lio_ethdev.c       |  7 ++++++-
>>>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/liquidio.rst b/doc/guides/nics/liquidio.rst
>>> index 4ccde0c..7bc1604 100644
>>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/liquidio.rst
>>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/liquidio.rst
>>> @@ -42,7 +42,9 @@ Supported LiquidIO Adapters
>>>  -----------------------------
>>>  
>>>  - LiquidIO II CN2350 210SV/225SV
>>> +- LiquidIO II CN2350 210SVPT
>>>  - LiquidIO II CN2360 210SV/225SV
>>> +- LiquidIO II CN2360 210SVPT
>>
>> Do you want to update release notes to announce new device support?
> 
> Sure, will do.
> 
>>
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  Pre-Installation Configuration
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/liquidio/base/lio_hw_defs.h b/drivers/net/liquidio/base/lio_hw_defs.h
>>> index c7f97f2..d4cd23c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/liquidio/base/lio_hw_defs.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/liquidio/base/lio_hw_defs.h
>>> @@ -43,10 +43,14 @@
>>>  #define LIO_CN23XX_VF_VID	0x9712
>>>  
>>>  /* CN23xx subsystem device ids */
>>> -#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2350_210	0x0004
>>> -#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2360_210	0x0005
>>> -#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2360_225	0x0006
>>> -#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2350_225	0x0007
>>> +#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2350_210		0x0004
>>> +#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2360_210		0x0005
>>> +#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2360_225		0x0006
>>> +#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2350_225		0x0007
>>> +#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2350_210SVPN3	0x0008
>>> +#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2360_210SVPN3	0x0009
>>> +#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2350_210SVPT	0x000a
>>> +#define PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2360_210SVPT	0x000b
>>>  
>>>  /* --------------------------CONFIG VALUES------------------------ */
>>>  
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/liquidio/lio_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/liquidio/lio_ethdev.c
>>> index 239f6af..2ffbfd2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/liquidio/lio_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/liquidio/lio_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -405,6 +405,10 @@ lio_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
>>>  	/* CN23xx 10G cards */
>>>  	case PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2350_210:
>>>  	case PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2360_210:
>>> +	case PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2350_210SVPN3:
>>> +	case PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2360_210SVPN3:
>>> +	case PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2350_210SVPT:
>>> +	case PCI_SUBSYS_DEV_ID_CN2360_210SVPT:
>>>  		devinfo->speed_capa = ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G;
>>>  		break;
>>>  	/* CN23xx 25G cards */
>>> @@ -413,8 +417,9 @@ lio_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
>>>  		devinfo->speed_capa = ETH_LINK_SPEED_25G;
>>>  		break;
>>>  	default:
>>> +		devinfo->speed_capa = ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G;
>>>  		lio_dev_err(lio_dev,
>>> -			    "Unknown CN23XX subsystem device id. Not setting speed capability.\n");
>>> +			    "Unknown CN23XX subsystem device id. Setting 10G as default link speed.\n");
>>
>> Instead of setting speed and default and print an error log, why not added cases
>> for new devices and set to 10G there?
> 
> Our thinking was to avoid error log that come out as not setting link speed when an old
> DPDK driver is used on a LiquidIO VF compliant device that isn’t yet in the driver.

With old driver, pci device_id also won't be there for new device, and driver
won't probe it at all, so there won't be an issue of not setting link speed, am
I missing something?

> This is for forward compliance. We will of course add cases for new devices as they 
> come along. Is this reasonable?
> 
>>
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>>  	devinfo->max_rx_queues = lio_dev->max_rx_queues;
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-25 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-24  4:42 Srisivasubramanian S
2017-10-24 17:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-25 18:06   ` Srisivasubramanian Srinivasan
2017-10-25 18:23     ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-10-26  2:23       ` Srisivasubramanian Srinivasan
2017-10-26 18:46         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-26 19:17 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ffa3a928-cab5-2562-2c90-c066d994630c@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ssrinivasan@caviumnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).