From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E712646AD3; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:15:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D874067C; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:15:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out203-205-221-164.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-164.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.164]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id 6D21340676 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:15:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1751386490; bh=ykX5Tc7AqhknegLk52LYRvHmL//E51g+bLj9tzIxMck=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=DXG6t3pwbSIoEBx8fg95EnDuEAuIDjvD+YENT3mb9zZ/TSmVT5ZXAjBU9dEJMmKGt SkiE6ESfxHoAWxwFXk73xfbdRgGkpDGLNSJjGldZvy8IlNbSNEFQNRttFRSp62Zc0R LMU2IcZ+rqaEghTbZC/iG8GdYst3VL1Vc/AjQBWo= Received: from ar ([113.231.127.221]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszc16-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 3B002AA4; Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:14:48 +0800 X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1751386488tcwi7anzi Message-ID: X-QQ-XMAILINFO: N/WmRbclY25G/DImBq3olCSSknCPMwuRv8kGomUrg0NiEeEUojj3L08Oxyou5+ csIsODF577p2ESeHzXaLY5FfiBE1OJPcVJnf4YFgT6Gx21cEkYknxul5lf3y17EQUxtwUyUtRYkO EO9R0ItWeRtSd/LR31U0uuSI7uZ6MtZO1jYhCek35Rm6rbXp2pSYsWqLQba9EJi6D0por6+yNxKm QEY9CeLAH0Hj8hTU69mlrNowvaYvNlJovcz7378sCUkCB8IeO+sB0xjTBeUp4GUy/6os2U7Z+4SB NBvcDCcf0x8fHEbtrj47OLml8LtcNoWFawsCjvvmsB9DWSI1+K5Hqo7XnZSoHRLbxcu3mm7Q7UIx BT1ak5UZNPryn8dk3ebyZwgE8rbQFYflfq2j6+CTbtY+VdH/bZP4eTxEzkyZnZtGajmmWIOMWTlz TveL+SKw9lTeVI6ZJ19rzfgEJeQNlad1u3lmoDGrdd98TcrYrCxfGCCLbtu8Hm2Be8G3i89a1Fwo 4lGrSPYuMDIPvnbUL7oF3qmBV+rGETfQnZAFYUC/v5UUblVdVM4kY1nqe5dpbY2dY36nHg+Wsbmw YP33Fri7F+XHG7uXBTmUft+JnkaxffUivmtkzxV0C2HX4GeQh650gOeLs/iC9OMeDJ723gZ8uwb3 ei5u6tj+B4T9HRhdQE2RzWNtM+qBePq1GU7gwd+n9P8n5UoFS+khRs2QvXT+vxQZ3DTky3mUwx11 P82eVFmcvp2+jrWclv45HxbVJ9KIRx8/IyBQkkv1A1Spq3rHlLmO0XbRwBwMIftDH9V/hRSnyOFo ILe/65+rJr70diCqcerrNS+PuHG8lAwRuqxHTOi5m1rQnMCX4/QY0zWABw//ytlNT2/oc1KH6wa7 AwNjKZKffnVmTybQY9KquR4SEXzxJ7bXH48iY4g/5APKkpXjv5yGJBzz4UQD6ZELfp6MLLnCJPjL NA4ITtAQTjI7qc+AwtmA== X-QQ-XMRINFO: Nq+8W0+stu50PRdwbJxPCL0= From: uk7b@foxmail.com To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Sun Yuechi , Stanislaw Kardach Subject: [PATCH 2/5] eal/riscv/spinlock: add rte_cpuflag.h Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 00:13:39 +0800 X-OQ-MSGID: <20250701161342.46750-3-uk7b@foxmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.0 In-Reply-To: <20250701161342.46750-1-uk7b@foxmail.com> References: <20250701161342.46750-1-uk7b@foxmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org From: Sun Yuechi Same as the x86 style, include "rte_cpuflags.h" in rte_spinlock.h so that files like lib/fib/dir24_8.c don’t need to include it. Signed-off-by: Sun Yuechi --- lib/eal/riscv/include/rte_spinlock.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/lib/eal/riscv/include/rte_spinlock.h b/lib/eal/riscv/include/rte_spinlock.h index 5fe4980e44..afbe83a061 100644 --- a/lib/eal/riscv/include/rte_spinlock.h +++ b/lib/eal/riscv/include/rte_spinlock.h @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include #include "generic/rte_spinlock.h" +#include "rte_cpuflags.h" #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { -- 2.50.0