DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wan Junjie" <wan.junjie@foxmail.com>
To: "Remy Horton" <remy.horton@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] lib/metrics: add unregister api for metrics
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:28:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_FF2D9BC79C8EABBAC2BEFD5770FC93356B07@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd2cad43-31ab-89be-bc70-1a36c7822459@intel.com>

Bitratestats test fails even without my patch.  The reason is that metrics lib has no de-init process. Harman Kalra has submited a patch for this. 
Check https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/50451


As for metrics lib, the array block of metadata may be better on cache side. Since rte_metrics_update_values is called periodicly in bitrate lib. 




 
---Original---
From: "Remy Horton"<remy.horton@intel.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 28, 2019 19:53 PM
To: "Junjie Wan"<wan.junjie@foxmail.com>;
Cc: "dev"<dev@dpdk.org>;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] lib/metrics: add unregister api for metrics


The tests for metrics themselves now all pass, but there is failure with 
bitrate statistics (bitrate stats uses metrics underneath). Latency 
statistics, which also uses metrics, seems ok though.

RTE>>bitratestats_autotest
  + ------------------------------------------------------- +
  + Test Suite : BitRate Stats Unit Test Suite
port in ring setup : 0
  + ------------------------------------------------------- +
  + TestCase [ 0] : test_stats_bitrate_create succeeded
  + TestCase [ 1] : test_stats_bitrate_reg failed
  + TestCase [ 2] : test_stats_bitrate_reg_invalidpointer succeeded
  + TestCase [ 3] : test_stats_bitrate_calc_invalid_bitrate_data succeeded
Invalid port_id=33
  + TestCase [ 4] : test_stats_bitrate_calc_invalid_portid_1 succeeded
Invalid port_id=65535
  + TestCase [ 5] : test_stats_bitrate_calc_invalid_portid_2 succeeded
Invalid port_id=31
  + TestCase [ 6] : test_stats_bitrate_calc_non_existing_portid succeeded
  + TestCase [ 7] : test_stats_bitrate_calc succeeded
  + ------------------------------------------------------- +
  + Test Suite Summary
  + Tests Total :        8
  + Tests Skipped :      0
  + Tests Executed :     8
  + Tests Unsupported:   0
  + Tests Passed :       7
  + Tests Failed :       1
  + ------------------------------------------------------- +
Test Failed


Personally if I was reimplementing metrics I would be inclined to 
replace the single fixed-size metadata[] array that is carved up with 
something more dynamic, perhaps a 2d linked-list. Doing so would 
probably negate the need for a bitmap.



On 27/02/2019 17:19, Junjie Wan wrote:
> From: junka <wan.junjie@foxmail.com>
>
> The bitmap will help maintain the metrics. We can dynamically
> add and remove metrics data. For example, after uninit latency lib,
> it could remove itself from the metrics. This could make the result
> from rte_metrics_get_names much more simple to display the wanted
> metrics data only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junjie Wan <wan.junjie@foxmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-28 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-22  6:16 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] "  =?gb18030?B?zfK/ob3c?=
2019-02-22 13:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " wanjunjie
2019-02-22 15:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " wanjunjie
2019-02-22 15:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " wanjunjie
2019-02-26 16:10       ` Remy Horton
2019-02-27 17:19       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Junjie Wan
2019-02-28 11:53         ` Remy Horton
2019-02-28 13:28           ` Wan Junjie [this message]
2019-02-28 13:55             ` Remy Horton
2019-04-02  0:27         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02  0:27           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02  0:30           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-02  0:30             ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tencent_FF2D9BC79C8EABBAC2BEFD5770FC93356B07@qq.com \
    --to=wan.junjie@foxmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=remy.horton@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).