From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from m50-111.126.com (m50-111.126.com [123.125.50.111]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72E7B3E8; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 03:03:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=126.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=cGmGY Jrqh1ViZC5C47nhy7zEG8PdyBCdt1/gA6I+ghk=; b=pnJ0AU9jRvvKzRN4kTT5u PV38bgUOTC5UBYwaOU+yR4RK10kbsAuSsZ5m0Y+OkPP4Mvo4dPrmsFkyqHzEGDik hj/v5NJwcFuGpZyaBa3rAP2eDHXoe+0+ZjC63moh0pHhBiXMaawFEGf5kHtsXhX0 Swij6tKK77KFv5HQiioxps= Received: from qqPC (unknown [59.108.29.42]) by smtp5 (Coremail) with SMTP id jtKowABnwTRlz9JUc0_2AA--.1064S2; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 10:03:19 +0800 (CST) From: "lhffjzh" To: , Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:03:16 +0800 Message-ID: <007801d040e7$e84d0890$b8e719b0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdBA5+UQFz6nFA9jTpabU6Guw9bEcg== Content-Language: zh-cn x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AagU A55z Bu4Z D0KQ Gjl7 Iz4x I4Jw KS3I OOKH Q9u2 RZpn SRCO aRWD b2ag b+1S cXii; 3; ZABlAHYAQABkAHAAZABrAC4AbwByAGcAOwBkAHQAcwBAAGQAcABkAGsALgBvAHIAZwA7AG0AYQBpAG4AdABhAGkAbgBlAHIAcwBAAGQAcABkAGsALgBvAHIAZwA=; Sosha1_v1; 7; {895AAE8F-78FB-4EB1-A05D-2C54D95DC338}; bABoAGYAZgBqAHoAaABAADEAMgA2AC4AYwBvAG0A; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 02:03:11 GMT; QgBvAG4AZAAgAGYAZQBhAHQAdQByAGUAIABjAGEAbgAnAHQAIAByAHUAbgBuAGkAbgBnACAAdwBlAGwAbAAgAG8AbgAgADQAMABHACAAaQA0ADAAZQAgAE4ASQBDAHMA x-cr-puzzleid: {895AAE8F-78FB-4EB1-A05D-2C54D95DC338} X-CM-TRANSID: jtKowABnwTRlz9JUc0_2AA--.1064S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoWrur4DKr18Jw18Cr45Zw43Wrg_yoW3trc_C3 48J34jgwsaqa1qkw4YyF48tw43KF45C3yUKF4vqryrGF1vvrWDWr95CwsIva15ur40qa43 tFn3JF92v343ujkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8ksqtUUUUU== X-Originating-IP: [59.108.29.42] X-CM-SenderInfo: hokiwyl2k6ij2wof0z/1tbiGBmXWUl16m3SYgAAsE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: maintainers@dpdk.org Subject: [dts] Bond feature can't running well on 40G i40e NICs X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 02:03:25 -0000 Hi DPDK maintainers, We encounter confusion recently which is 40G i40e NICs bond issue, our bonding logic as below, the ixgbe bonding is running well both 1.7.1 and 1.8.0, but i40e are all failed. Create bond port -> config slave ports(tx/rx) -> start slave ports -> add slave port into bond port -> start bond port -> tx/rx on bond port On 1.7.1, the 40G bonding port always can't be started, them status are down and speed are 0. On 1.8.0, the 40G bonding port start and send network package correctly, but can't receive any package with BONDING_MODE_BALANCE mode and all policies like BALANCE_XMIT_POLICY_LAYER2. In BONDING_MODE_ROUND_ROBIN mode, bonding port can send/receive a few network packages(less than 100) per seconds. Could you please help us for this? any clue is welcome. Thanks and Regards, Haifeng