From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F5C1B29E for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 06:29:51 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2018 21:29:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,463,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="28798777" Received: from dpdk-test47.sh.intel.com ([10.67.118.152]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2018 21:29:49 -0800 From: wang fei To: dts@dpdk.org Cc: yong.liu@intel.com, wang fei Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:58:54 +0800 Message-Id: <1517817535-23964-2-git-send-email-feix.y.wang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1517817535-23964-1-git-send-email-feix.y.wang@intel.com> References: <1517817535-23964-1-git-send-email-feix.y.wang@intel.com> Subject: [dts] [DTS][PATCH V4 3/3] conf/nic_single_core_perf.cfg: add suite configuration file X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 05:29:51 -0000 For next branch: add the expected throughput values for NICs: "niantic"(4 ports), "fortville_25g"(2 ports), and the values will be parsed by the test suite. Signed-off-by: wang fei --- conf/nic_single_core_perf.cfg | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 conf/nic_single_core_perf.cfg diff --git a/conf/nic_single_core_perf.cfg b/conf/nic_single_core_perf.cfg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8746326 --- /dev/null +++ b/conf/nic_single_core_perf.cfg @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[suite] + +# list expected throughput values for 64byte packet size and different +# txd/rxd, these values may vary dut to different test enviroment, +# please adjust accordingly, the below nnt and fvl25g expected +# throughputs were tested under Purly,Ubuntu 16.04, IXIA +# the formate for the expected throughput is a dictinary which means +# {"packet size": {"descriptor ring size": "throughput"}} +throughput_nnt = {64: {128: 53.435, 512: 53.699, 2048: 42.798}} +throughput_fvl25g = {64: {512: 43.777, 2048: 43.651}} -- 2.7.4