test suite reviews and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan
@ 2019-06-25  8:19 yufengmx
  2019-06-25  8:19 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 1/2] " yufengmx
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: yufengmx @ 2019-06-25  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dts; +Cc: yufengmx

 upload examples/flow_classify test plan 
 update test plan index list 

v5: 
 - Follow Tu, Lijuan suggestion 
 -  fix inaccurate description about packet generator(scapy or ixia) 
 -  fix inaccurate description about mixed streams 
 -  add more description about multiple streams. 
 -  remove No nic type limitation description. 
 -  add supported nics description. 

v4: 
 -  fix inaccurate description 

v3: 
 - Follow Lin Xueqin suggestion 
 -  remove burst packet type limitation 
 -  add functional test case support 
 -  remove ixia command description 

yufengmx (2):
  [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan
  [examples/flow_classify]: add flow_classify_test_plan label

 test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst | 332 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 test_plans/index.rst                   |   1 +
 2 files changed, 333 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst

-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [dts] [PATCH V5 1/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan
  2019-06-25  8:19 [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan yufengmx
@ 2019-06-25  8:19 ` yufengmx
  2019-06-25  8:41   ` Lin, Xueqin
  2019-06-25  8:19 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 2/2] [examples/flow_classify]: add flow_classify_test_plan label yufengmx
  2019-06-26  8:10 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan Tu, Lijuan
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: yufengmx @ 2019-06-25  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dts; +Cc: yufengmx


This test plan is for flow classify feature.
flow_classify is the tool to call flow_classify lib for group of packets,
just after receiving them or before transmitting them.

Signed-off-by: yufengmx <yufengx.mo@intel.com>
---
 test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst | 332 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 332 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst

diff --git a/test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1b30b06
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+.. Copyright (c) <2019>, Intel Corporation
+   All rights reserved.
+
+   Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+   modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
+   are met:
+
+   - Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+
+   - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
+     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
+     the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+     distribution.
+
+   - Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
+     contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
+     from this software without specific prior written permission.
+
+   THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+   "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+   LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS
+   FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+   COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT,
+   INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
+   (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
+   SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
+   HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
+   STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
+   ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED
+   OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+=============
+flow classify
+=============
+
+This document provides test plan for flow classify feature.
+
+Flow Classify provides flow record information with some measured properties.
+
+DPDK provides a Flow Classification library that provides the ability
+to classify an input packet by matching it against a set of Flow rules.
+The implementation supports counting of IPv4 5-tuple packets which match a
+particular Flow rule only.
+
+example/flow_classify is the tool to call flow_classify lib for group of packets,
+just after receiving them or before transmitting them. It is intended as a
+demonstration of the basic components of a DPDK forwarding application which uses
+the Flow Classify library API's.
+
+DPDK technical doc refer to::
+
+    dpdk/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/flow_classify.rst
+    dpdk/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst
+
+Prerequisites
+-------------
+2xNICs (2 full duplex optical ports per NIC)
+Flow Classify should run on 2 pair link peer at least.
+
+i40e driver nic:
+Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GbE SFP+ 1572
+Ethernet Controller XXV710 for 25GbE SFP28 158b
+Ethernet Controller XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ 1583
+
+ixgbe driver nic:
+82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection 10fb
+
+HW configuration
+----------------
+link peer topology::
+
+            Tester                          DUT
+          .-------.                      .-------.
+          | port0 | <------------------> | port0 |
+          | port1 | <------------------> | port1 |
+          '-------'                      '-------'
+
+Stream configuration
+--------------------
+five valid streams(as examples/flow_classify/ipv4_rules_file.txt),
+three invalid streams are the streams beyond config file.
+
+UDP_1::
+
+    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,UDP/IP, Fixed 64.
+    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 2.2.2.7 Src  Address: 2.2.2.3
+    UDP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    Ether()/IP (proto='udp', src='2.2.2.3', dst='2.2.2.7')/UDP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
+
+UDP_2::
+
+    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,UDP/IP, Fixed 64.
+    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.9.9.7 Src  Address: 9.9.9.3
+    UDP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    Ether()/IP (proto='udp', src='9.9.9.3', dst='9.9.9.7')/UDP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
+
+UDP_invalid::
+
+    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,UDP/IP, Fixed 64.
+    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.8.7.6 Src  Address: 192.168.0.36
+    UDP Header: Src Port: 10  Dest Port: 11
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    Ether()/IP (proto='udp', src='9.8.7.6', dst='192.168.0.36')/UDP(sport=10, dport=11)/Raw()
+
+TCP_1::
+
+    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,TCP/IP, Fixed 64.
+    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.9.9.7 Src  Address: 9.9.9.3
+    TCP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    Ether()/IP (proto='tcp', src='9.9.9.3', dst='9.9.9.7')/TCP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
+
+TCP_2::
+
+    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,TCP/IP, Fixed 64.
+    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.9.8.7 Src  Address: 9.9.8.3
+    TCP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    Ether()/IP (proto='tcp', src='9.9.8.3', dst='9.9.8.7')/TCP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
+
+TCP_invalid::
+
+    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,TCP/IP, Fixed 64.
+    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.8.7.6 Src  Address: 192.168.0.36
+    TCP Header: Src Port: 10  Dest Port: 11
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    Ether()/IP (proto='tcp', src='9.8.7.6', dst='192.168.0.36')/TCP(sport=10, dport=11)/Raw()
+
+SCTP_1::
+
+    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4, None, Fixed 256.
+    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 2.3.4.5 Src  Address: 6.7.8.9
+    SCTP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
+    Protocol: 132-SCTP
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    Ether()/IP (proto='sctp', src='6.7.8.9', dst='2.3.4.5')/SCTP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
+
+SCTP_invalid::
+
+    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4, None, Fixed 256.
+    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.8.7.6 Src  Address: 192.168.0.36
+    SCTP Header: Src Port: 10  Dest Port: 11
+    Protocol: 132-SCTP
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    Ether()/IP (proto='sctp', src='9.8.7.6', dst='192.168.0.36')/SCTP(sport=10, dport=11)/Raw()
+
+
+Compilation:
+------------
+steps::
+
+    cd $DPDK_PATH
+    export RTE_TARGET=$DPDK_PATH
+    export RTE_SDK=`pwd`
+    make -C examples/flow_classify
+
+Flow classify bin file under::
+
+    $DPDK_PATH/examples/flow_classify/build/flow_classify
+
+rule config file(default)::
+
+    $DPDK_PATH/examples/flow_classify/ipv4_rules_file.txt
+
+Test cases
+----------
+The idea behind the testing process is to compare packet count sending by
+ixia packet generator with packet count filtered by flow_classify. Valid
+packets should be in flow_classify output and invalid packets should be ignored.
+The rules are configured in a txt file. Testing content includes single
+udp/tcp/sctp stream and multiple streams.
+
+Test Case : check valid rule with udp stream
+============================================
+Send 32 packets of valid stream(as UDP_1 or UDP_2 in Stream configuration),
+then check the total received packets in flow_classify's output message.
+
+steps:
+
+#. boot up flow_classify::
+
+    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
+
+#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
+
+    scapy> sendp(UDP_1, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
+
+#. check flow_classify output contain the following message::
+
+    rule[0] count=1
+    or
+    rule[1] count=1
+
+Test Case : check invalid rule with udp stream
+==============================================
+Send 32 packets of invalid stream(as UDP_invalid in Stream configuration),
+then check flow_classify's output message has no count message
+
+steps:
+
+#. boot up flow_classify::
+
+    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
+
+#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
+
+    scapy> sendp(UDP_invalid, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
+
+#. check flow_classify output has no message as "rule[xxx] count=xxx", such as::
+
+     rule[0] count=1
+
+Test Case : check valid rule with tcp stream
+============================================
+Send 32 packets of valid stream(as TCP_1 or TCP_2 in Stream configuration),
+then check the total received packets in flow_classify's output message.
+
+steps:
+
+#. boot up flow_classify::
+
+    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
+
+#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
+
+    scapy> sendp(TCP_1, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
+
+#. check flow_classify output contain the following message::
+
+    rule[2] count=1
+    or
+    rule[3] count=1
+
+Test Case : check invalid rule with tcp stream
+==============================================
+Send 32 packets of invalid stream(as TCP_invalid in Stream configuration),
+then check flow_classify's output message has no count message.
+
+steps:
+
+#. boot up flow_classify::
+
+    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
+
+#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
+
+    scapy> sendp(TCP_invalid, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
+
+#. check flow_classify output has no message as "rule[xxx] count=xxx", such as::
+
+    rule[2] count=1
+
+Test Case : check valid rule with sctp stream
+=============================================
+Send 32 packets of valid stream(as SCTP_1 in Stream configuration),
+then check the total received packets in flow_classify's output message.
+
+steps:
+
+#. boot up flow_classify::
+
+    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
+
+#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
+
+    scapy> sendp(SCTP_1, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
+
+#. check flow_classify output contain the following message::
+
+    rule[4] count=1
+
+Test Case : check invalid rule with sctp stream
+===============================================
+Send 32 packets of invalid stream(as SCTP_invalid in Stream configuration),
+then check flow_classify's output message has no count message.
+
+steps:
+
+#. boot up flow_classify::
+
+    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
+
+#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
+
+    scapy> sendp(SCTP_invalid, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
+
+#. check flow_classify output has no "rule[xxx] count=xxx" message, such as::
+
+    rule[4] count=1
+
+Test Case: check valid/invalid rule with multiple streams
+=========================================================
+Send multiple streams, 32 packets/each stream type(all stream types in Stream configuration),
+then check if they are filtered/captured by flow_classify.
+
+steps:
+
+#. boot up flow_classify::
+
+    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
+
+#. send multiple stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia), include SCTP_1/SCTP_invalid/TCP_invalid/TCP_1/TCP_2/UDP_invalid/UDP_1/UDP_2::
+
+    scapy> multiple_stream = [SCTP_1, SCTP_invalid, TCP_invalid, TCP_1, TCP_2, UDP_invalid, UDP_1, UDP_2]
+    scapy> sendp(multiple_stream, iface='xxxx', count=32)
+
+#. check flow_classify output only contain the following count message::
+
+    rule[0] count=1
+    rule[1] count=1
+    rule[2] count=1
+    rule[3] count=1
+    rule[4] count=1
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [dts] [PATCH V5 2/2] [examples/flow_classify]: add flow_classify_test_plan label
  2019-06-25  8:19 [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan yufengmx
  2019-06-25  8:19 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 1/2] " yufengmx
@ 2019-06-25  8:19 ` yufengmx
  2019-06-26  8:10 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan Tu, Lijuan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: yufengmx @ 2019-06-25  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dts; +Cc: yufengmx


add flow_classify_test_plan label

Signed-off-by: yufengmx <yufengx.mo@intel.com>
---
 test_plans/index.rst | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/test_plans/index.rst b/test_plans/index.rst
index 3e857ee..52d4e55 100644
--- a/test_plans/index.rst
+++ b/test_plans/index.rst
@@ -216,3 +216,4 @@ The following are the test plans for the DPDK DTS automated test system.
     distributor_test_plan
     efd_test_plan
     example_build_test_plan
+    flow_classify_test_plan
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dts] [PATCH V5 1/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan
  2019-06-25  8:19 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 1/2] " yufengmx
@ 2019-06-25  8:41   ` Lin, Xueqin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lin, Xueqin @ 2019-06-25  8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mo, YufengX, dts; +Cc: Mo, YufengX

Acked-by: Lin Xueqin <xueqin.lin@intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of yufengmx
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 4:20 PM
> To: dts@dpdk.org
> Cc: Mo, YufengX <yufengx.mo@intel.com>
> Subject: [dts] [PATCH V5 1/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan
> 
> 
> This test plan is for flow classify feature.
> flow_classify is the tool to call flow_classify lib for group of packets, just after
> receiving them or before transmitting them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: yufengmx <yufengx.mo@intel.com>
> ---
>  test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst | 332
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 332 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst
> 
> diff --git a/test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst
> b/test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1b30b06
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
> +.. Copyright (c) <2019>, Intel Corporation
> +   All rights reserved.
> +
> +   Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> +   modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> +   are met:
> +
> +   - Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> +     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> +
> +   - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> +     notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> +     the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> +     distribution.
> +
> +   - Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
> +     contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
> +     from this software without specific prior written permission.
> +
> +   THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND
> CONTRIBUTORS
> +   "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT
> NOT
> +   LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
> FITNESS
> +   FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
> +   COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT,
> INDIRECT,
> +   INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
> +   (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE
> GOODS OR
> +   SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
> +   HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
> CONTRACT,
> +   STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
> +   ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF
> ADVISED
> +   OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> +
> +=============
> +flow classify
> +=============
> +
> +This document provides test plan for flow classify feature.
> +
> +Flow Classify provides flow record information with some measured
> properties.
> +
> +DPDK provides a Flow Classification library that provides the ability
> +to classify an input packet by matching it against a set of Flow rules.
> +The implementation supports counting of IPv4 5-tuple packets which
> +match a particular Flow rule only.
> +
> +example/flow_classify is the tool to call flow_classify lib for group
> +of packets, just after receiving them or before transmitting them. It
> +is intended as a demonstration of the basic components of a DPDK
> +forwarding application which uses the Flow Classify library API's.
> +
> +DPDK technical doc refer to::
> +
> +    dpdk/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/flow_classify.rst
> +    dpdk/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst
> +
> +Prerequisites
> +-------------
> +2xNICs (2 full duplex optical ports per NIC) Flow Classify should run
> +on 2 pair link peer at least.
> +
> +i40e driver nic:
> +Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GbE SFP+ 1572 Ethernet Controller XXV710
> +for 25GbE SFP28 158b Ethernet Controller XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ 1583
> +
> +ixgbe driver nic:
> +82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection 10fb
> +
> +HW configuration
> +----------------
> +link peer topology::
> +
> +            Tester                          DUT
> +          .-------.                      .-------.
> +          | port0 | <------------------> | port0 |
> +          | port1 | <------------------> | port1 |
> +          '-------'                      '-------'
> +
> +Stream configuration
> +--------------------
> +five valid streams(as examples/flow_classify/ipv4_rules_file.txt),
> +three invalid streams are the streams beyond config file.
> +
> +UDP_1::
> +
> +    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,UDP/IP, Fixed 64.
> +    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 2.2.2.7 Src  Address: 2.2.2.3
> +    UDP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +    Ether()/IP (proto='udp', src='2.2.2.3',
> + dst='2.2.2.7')/UDP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
> +
> +UDP_2::
> +
> +    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,UDP/IP, Fixed 64.
> +    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.9.9.7 Src  Address: 9.9.9.3
> +    UDP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +    Ether()/IP (proto='udp', src='9.9.9.3',
> + dst='9.9.9.7')/UDP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
> +
> +UDP_invalid::
> +
> +    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,UDP/IP, Fixed 64.
> +    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.8.7.6 Src  Address: 192.168.0.36
> +    UDP Header: Src Port: 10  Dest Port: 11
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +    Ether()/IP (proto='udp', src='9.8.7.6',
> + dst='192.168.0.36')/UDP(sport=10, dport=11)/Raw()
> +
> +TCP_1::
> +
> +    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,TCP/IP, Fixed 64.
> +    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.9.9.7 Src  Address: 9.9.9.3
> +    TCP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +    Ether()/IP (proto='tcp', src='9.9.9.3',
> + dst='9.9.9.7')/TCP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
> +
> +TCP_2::
> +
> +    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,TCP/IP, Fixed 64.
> +    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.9.8.7 Src  Address: 9.9.8.3
> +    TCP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +    Ether()/IP (proto='tcp', src='9.9.8.3',
> + dst='9.9.8.7')/TCP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
> +
> +TCP_invalid::
> +
> +    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4,TCP/IP, Fixed 64.
> +    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.8.7.6 Src  Address: 192.168.0.36
> +    TCP Header: Src Port: 10  Dest Port: 11
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +    Ether()/IP (proto='tcp', src='9.8.7.6',
> + dst='192.168.0.36')/TCP(sport=10, dport=11)/Raw()
> +
> +SCTP_1::
> +
> +    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4, None, Fixed 256.
> +    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 2.3.4.5 Src  Address: 6.7.8.9
> +    SCTP Header: Src Port: 32  Dest Port: 33
> +    Protocol: 132-SCTP
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +    Ether()/IP (proto='sctp', src='6.7.8.9',
> + dst='2.3.4.5')/SCTP(sport=32, dport=33)/Raw()
> +
> +SCTP_invalid::
> +
> +    Frame Data/Protocols: Ethernet 2 0800, IPv4, None, Fixed 256.
> +    IPv4 Header Page: Dest Address: 9.8.7.6 Src  Address: 192.168.0.36
> +    SCTP Header: Src Port: 10  Dest Port: 11
> +    Protocol: 132-SCTP
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +    Ether()/IP (proto='sctp', src='9.8.7.6',
> + dst='192.168.0.36')/SCTP(sport=10, dport=11)/Raw()
> +
> +
> +Compilation:
> +------------
> +steps::
> +
> +    cd $DPDK_PATH
> +    export RTE_TARGET=$DPDK_PATH
> +    export RTE_SDK=`pwd`
> +    make -C examples/flow_classify
> +
> +Flow classify bin file under::
> +
> +    $DPDK_PATH/examples/flow_classify/build/flow_classify
> +
> +rule config file(default)::
> +
> +    $DPDK_PATH/examples/flow_classify/ipv4_rules_file.txt
> +
> +Test cases
> +----------
> +The idea behind the testing process is to compare packet count sending
> +by ixia packet generator with packet count filtered by flow_classify.
> +Valid packets should be in flow_classify output and invalid packets should
> be ignored.
> +The rules are configured in a txt file. Testing content includes single
> +udp/tcp/sctp stream and multiple streams.
> +
> +Test Case : check valid rule with udp stream
> +============================================
> +Send 32 packets of valid stream(as UDP_1 or UDP_2 in Stream
> +configuration), then check the total received packets in flow_classify's
> output message.
> +
> +steps:
> +
> +#. boot up flow_classify::
> +
> +    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
> +
> +#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
> +
> +    scapy> sendp(UDP_1, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
> +
> +#. check flow_classify output contain the following message::
> +
> +    rule[0] count=1
> +    or
> +    rule[1] count=1
> +
> +Test Case : check invalid rule with udp stream
> +==============================================
> +Send 32 packets of invalid stream(as UDP_invalid in Stream
> +configuration), then check flow_classify's output message has no count
> +message
> +
> +steps:
> +
> +#. boot up flow_classify::
> +
> +    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
> +
> +#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
> +
> +    scapy> sendp(UDP_invalid, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
> +
> +#. check flow_classify output has no message as "rule[xxx] count=xxx", such
> as::
> +
> +     rule[0] count=1
> +
> +Test Case : check valid rule with tcp stream
> +============================================
> +Send 32 packets of valid stream(as TCP_1 or TCP_2 in Stream
> +configuration), then check the total received packets in flow_classify's
> output message.
> +
> +steps:
> +
> +#. boot up flow_classify::
> +
> +    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
> +
> +#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
> +
> +    scapy> sendp(TCP_1, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
> +
> +#. check flow_classify output contain the following message::
> +
> +    rule[2] count=1
> +    or
> +    rule[3] count=1
> +
> +Test Case : check invalid rule with tcp stream
> +==============================================
> +Send 32 packets of invalid stream(as TCP_invalid in Stream
> +configuration), then check flow_classify's output message has no count
> message.
> +
> +steps:
> +
> +#. boot up flow_classify::
> +
> +    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
> +
> +#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
> +
> +    scapy> sendp(TCP_invalid, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
> +
> +#. check flow_classify output has no message as "rule[xxx] count=xxx", such
> as::
> +
> +    rule[2] count=1
> +
> +Test Case : check valid rule with sctp stream
> +=============================================
> +Send 32 packets of valid stream(as SCTP_1 in Stream configuration),
> +then check the total received packets in flow_classify's output message.
> +
> +steps:
> +
> +#. boot up flow_classify::
> +
> +    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
> +
> +#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
> +
> +    scapy> sendp(SCTP_1, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
> +
> +#. check flow_classify output contain the following message::
> +
> +    rule[4] count=1
> +
> +Test Case : check invalid rule with sctp stream
> +===============================================
> +Send 32 packets of invalid stream(as SCTP_invalid in Stream
> +configuration), then check flow_classify's output message has no count
> message.
> +
> +steps:
> +
> +#. boot up flow_classify::
> +
> +    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
> +
> +#. send stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia)::
> +
> +    scapy> sendp(SCTP_invalid, iface='xxxxx', count=32)
> +
> +#. check flow_classify output has no "rule[xxx] count=xxx" message, such as::
> +
> +    rule[4] count=1
> +
> +Test Case: check valid/invalid rule with multiple streams
> +=========================================================
> +Send multiple streams, 32 packets/each stream type(all stream types in
> +Stream configuration), then check if they are filtered/captured by
> flow_classify.
> +
> +steps:
> +
> +#. boot up flow_classify::
> +
> +    ./flow_classify -c 4 -n 4 -- --rule_ipv4=<rule config file>
> +
> +#. send multiple stream by packet generator(e.g. scapy or ixia), include
> SCTP_1/SCTP_invalid/TCP_invalid/TCP_1/TCP_2/UDP_invalid/UDP_1/UDP_2
> ::
> +
> +    scapy> multiple_stream = [SCTP_1, SCTP_invalid, TCP_invalid, TCP_1,
> TCP_2, UDP_invalid, UDP_1, UDP_2]
> +    scapy> sendp(multiple_stream, iface='xxxx', count=32)
> +
> +#. check flow_classify output only contain the following count message::
> +
> +    rule[0] count=1
> +    rule[1] count=1
> +    rule[2] count=1
> +    rule[3] count=1
> +    rule[4] count=1
> \ No newline at end of file
> --
> 1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan
  2019-06-25  8:19 [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan yufengmx
  2019-06-25  8:19 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 1/2] " yufengmx
  2019-06-25  8:19 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 2/2] [examples/flow_classify]: add flow_classify_test_plan label yufengmx
@ 2019-06-26  8:10 ` Tu, Lijuan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tu, Lijuan @ 2019-06-26  8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mo, YufengX, dts; +Cc: Mo, YufengX

Applied the series, thanks

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of yufengmx
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 4:20 PM
> To: dts@dpdk.org
> Cc: Mo, YufengX <yufengx.mo@intel.com>
> Subject: [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan
> 
>  upload examples/flow_classify test plan  update test plan index list
> 
> v5:
>  - Follow Tu, Lijuan suggestion
>  -  fix inaccurate description about packet generator(scapy or ixia)
>  -  fix inaccurate description about mixed streams
>  -  add more description about multiple streams.
>  -  remove No nic type limitation description.
>  -  add supported nics description.
> 
> v4:
>  -  fix inaccurate description
> 
> v3:
>  - Follow Lin Xueqin suggestion
>  -  remove burst packet type limitation
>  -  add functional test case support
>  -  remove ixia command description
> 
> yufengmx (2):
>   [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan
>   [examples/flow_classify]: add flow_classify_test_plan label
> 
>  test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst | 332
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  test_plans/index.rst                   |   1 +
>  2 files changed, 333 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 test_plans/flow_classify_test_plan.rst
> 
> --
> 1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-26  8:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-25  8:19 [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan yufengmx
2019-06-25  8:19 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 1/2] " yufengmx
2019-06-25  8:41   ` Lin, Xueqin
2019-06-25  8:19 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 2/2] [examples/flow_classify]: add flow_classify_test_plan label yufengmx
2019-06-26  8:10 ` [dts] [PATCH V5 0/2] [examples/flow_classify]: upload test plan Tu, Lijuan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).