From: "Pei, Yulong" <yulong.pei@intel.com>
To: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>, "dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH 1/2] tests pmd: do changes due to performance test
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 01:52:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <188971FCDA171749BED5DA74ABF3E6F03B690712@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58B77787.1000109@intel.com>
Hi,
-----Original Message-----
From: Liu, Yong
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 9:38 AM
To: Pei, Yulong <yulong.pei@intel.com>; dts@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests pmd: do changes due to performance test
Yulong,
Some comments below.
Thanks,
Marvin
On 03/02/2017 09:35 AM, Yulong Pei wrote:
> 1. change to tcp stream traffic.
> 2. change duration to 60s.
> 3. using one entry point test_perf_single_core_performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yulong Pei <yulong.pei@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/TestSuite_pmd.py | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/TestSuite_pmd.py b/tests/TestSuite_pmd.py index
> bc59849..a548496 100644
> --- a/tests/TestSuite_pmd.py
> +++ b/tests/TestSuite_pmd.py
> @@ -68,11 +68,15 @@ class TestPmd(TestCase,IxiaPacketGenerator):
>
> self.blacklist = ""
>
> + # Update config file and rebuild to get best perf on FVL
> + self.dut.send_expect("sed -i -e
> + 's/CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_16BYTE_RX_DESC=n/CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_16
> + BYTE_RX_DESC=y/' ./config/common_base", "#", 20)
Not sure this configuration will affect performance, look like it only affect legacy Rx code path.
I40e developer suggested to do so when measure single core perf.
Will send v2 patch based on your below comments.
Best Regards
Yulong Pei
> + self.dut.build_install_dpdk(self.target)
> +
> # Based on h/w type, choose how many ports to use
> self.dut_ports = self.dut.get_ports()
>
> self.headers_size = HEADER_SIZE['eth'] + HEADER_SIZE[
> - 'ip'] + HEADER_SIZE['udp']
> + 'ip'] + HEADER_SIZE['tcp']
>
> self.ports_socket = self.dut.get_numa_id(self.dut_ports[0])
>
> @@ -84,15 +88,23 @@ class TestPmd(TestCase,IxiaPacketGenerator):
> """
> pass
>
> - def test_perf_pmd_performance_4ports(self):
> + def test_perf_single_core_performance(self):
> + """
> + Run single core performance
> + """
> + if len(self.dut_ports) == 4:
> + self.test_pmd_performance_4ports()
> + else:
> + self.test_pmd_performance_2ports()
> +
> +
> + def test_pmd_performance_4ports(self):
> """
> PMD Performance Benchmarking with 4 ports.
> """
Function named like "test_*" will be handled as normal case, please change function name without "test_" prefix.
> all_cores_mask =
> utils.create_mask(self.dut.get_core_list("all"))
>
> # prepare traffic generator input
> - self.verify(len(self.dut_ports) >= 4,
> - "Insufficient ports for 4 ports performance")
> tgen_input = []
>
>
> tgen_input.append((self.tester.get_local_port(self.dut_ports[0]),
> @@ -126,27 +138,25 @@ class TestPmd(TestCase,IxiaPacketGenerator):
> self.pmdout.start_testpmd(core_config, " --rxq=%d --txq=%d --portmask=%s --rss-ip --txrst=32 --txfreet=32 --txd=128 --txqflags=0xf01" % (queues, queues, port_mask), socket=self.ports_socket)
> command_line = self.pmdout.get_pmd_cmd()
>
> - info = "Executing PMD (mac fwd) using %s\n" % test_cycle['cores']
> + info = "Executing PMD using %s\n" % test_cycle['cores']
> self.rst_report(info, annex=True)
> self.logger.info(info)
> -
> self.rst_report(command_line + "\n\n", frame=True,
> annex=True)
>
> # self.dut.send_expect("set fwd mac", "testpmd> ", 100)
> - self.dut.send_expect("start", "testpmd> ")
> -
> + self.dut.send_expect("start", "testpmd> ", 100)
> for frame_size in self.frame_sizes:
> wirespeed = self.wirespeed(self.nic, frame_size, 4)
>
> # create pcap file
> self.logger.info("Running with frame size %d " % frame_size)
> - payload_size = frame_size - HEADER_SIZE['eth'] - HEADER_SIZE['ip']
> + payload_size = frame_size - self.headers_size
> self.tester.scapy_append(
> - 'wrpcap("test.pcap", [Ether(src="52:00:00:00:00:00")/IP(src="1.2.3.4",dst="1.1.1.1")/("X"*%d)])' % payload_size)
> + 'wrpcap("test.pcap",
> + [Ether(src="52:00:00:00:00:00")/IP(src="1.2.3.4",dst="1.1.1.1")/TCP(
> + )/("X"*%d)])' % payload_size)
> self.tester.scapy_execute()
>
> # run traffic generator
> - _, pps = self.tester.traffic_generator_throughput(tgen_input)
> + _, pps =
> + self.tester.traffic_generator_throughput(tgen_input,
> + rate_percent=100, delay=60)
>
> pps /= 1000000.0
> test_cycle['Mpps'][frame_size] = pps @@ -176,7
> +186,7 @@ class TestPmd(TestCase,IxiaPacketGenerator):
>
> self.result_table_print()
>
> - def test_perf_pmd_performance_2ports(self):
> + def test_pmd_performance_2ports(self):
Same comment as previous.
> """
> PMD Performance Benchmarking with 2 ports.
> """
> @@ -215,8 +225,9 @@ class TestPmd(TestCase,IxiaPacketGenerator):
> self.logger.info(info)
> self.rst_report(info, annex=True)
> self.rst_report(command_line + "\n\n", frame=True,
> annex=True)
> +
> + self.dut.send_expect("start", "testpmd> ", 100)
>
> - self.dut.send_expect("start", "testpmd> ")
> for frame_size in self.frame_sizes:
> wirespeed = self.wirespeed(self.nic, frame_size, 2)
>
> @@ -224,11 +235,12 @@ class TestPmd(TestCase,IxiaPacketGenerator):
> self.logger.info("Running with frame size %d " % frame_size)
> payload_size = frame_size - self.headers_size
> self.tester.scapy_append(
> - 'wrpcap("test.pcap", [Ether(src="52:00:00:00:00:00")/IP()/UDP()/("X"*%d)])' % payload_size)
> + 'wrpcap("test.pcap",
> + [Ether(src="52:00:00:00:00:00")/IP(src="1.2.3.4",dst="1.1.1.1")/TCP(
> + )/("X"*%d)])' % payload_size)
> self.tester.scapy_execute()
>
> # run traffic generator
> - _, pps = self.tester.traffic_generator_throughput(tgen_input)
> + _, pps =
> + self.tester.traffic_generator_throughput(tgen_input,
> + rate_percent=100, delay=60)
> +
>
> pps /= 1000000.0
> test_cycle['Mpps'][frame_size] = pps
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1488418539-8237-1-git-send-email-yulong.pei@intel.com>
2017-03-02 1:38 ` Liu, Yong
2017-03-02 1:52 ` Pei, Yulong [this message]
[not found] ` <1488418539-8237-2-git-send-email-yulong.pei@intel.com>
2017-03-02 1:53 ` [dts] [PATCH 2/2] tests l3fwd: fix issue for " Liu, Yong
2017-03-02 2:49 ` Pei, Yulong
2017-03-02 3:10 ` Liu, Yong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=188971FCDA171749BED5DA74ABF3E6F03B690712@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=yulong.pei@intel.com \
--cc=dts@dpdk.org \
--cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).