From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0325A9B for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 02:43:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2015 17:43:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,310,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="853232961" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2015 17:43:00 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:43:00 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.110.15) by fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:43:00 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.138]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.223]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:42:58 +0800 From: "Dong, ShijieX" To: "Liu, Yong" , "dts@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1] TIMEOUT on eal_flags_autotest Thread-Index: AQHRIZ+B54+LNBuCuU69EFJb6es1v56hAUYg Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 01:42:58 +0000 Message-ID: <1F89F50008D18D4EBA598B7DF3E7408901AFF3B8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1447733610-18238-1-git-send-email-shijiex.dong@intel.com> <564BD2EC.2040303@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <564BD2EC.2040303@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] TIMEOUT on eal_flags_autotest X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 01:43:02 -0000 Hi Liuyong The original value is 60 seconds, I test is 120 seconds. OK, because of the= "fialed several OS, in order to prevent the other systems but. -----Original Message----- From: Liu, Yong=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 9:23 AM To: Dong, ShijieX; dts@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] TIMEOUT on eal_flags_autotest Hi Shijie, As i known that timeout value has been extended. Could you give more inform= ation why four minutes is still not enough for this test? On 11/17/2015 12:13 PM, Shijie Dong wrote: > add time for exec eal_flags_autotest > Signed-off-by: Shijie Dong > --- > tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_eal.py | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_eal.py=20 > b/tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_eal.py > index d0b9696..d6d21e4 100644 > --- a/tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_eal.py > +++ b/tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_eal.py > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ class TestUnitTestsEal(TestCase): > self.verify('make: Leaving directory' in out, "Compilation fail= ed") > [arch, machine, self.env, toolchain] =3D self.target.split('-') > self.start_test_time =3D 60 > - self.run_cmd_time =3D 240 > + self.run_cmd_time =3D 300 > =20 > def set_up(self): > """