From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89BDA0524; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:43:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EBBC940; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:43:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBE2C93C for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:43:36 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: 7o8anE1eXaEhwbaF/BANhg0/8iaNWKzDXzX3bPjO53JjmTR9dXk9Y8TSjE7gY4gG/DyghSBTl9 eW8FP9mybJ+w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9816"; a="151514142" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,371,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="151514142" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Nov 2020 00:43:27 -0800 IronPort-SDR: Q/fIZ8LnafeKw94+t7SqKkWXPbwRe87q+f9pSEs2tx7Px0QrKQIRmsATwHpR7IyOQQekztLkaW MwTbF95kes1Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,371,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="359463882" Received: from fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.84]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2020 00:43:27 -0800 Received: from shsmsx606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) by fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:43:25 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:43:24 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:43:24 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Huang, ZhiminX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Huang, ZhiminX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1] doc/dts_gsg/sys_reqs:add known issue after update scapy 2.4.4 Thread-Index: AQHWw8d6U2z9hFaH0kGyr00cGW3QG6naGMuQ Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:43:24 +0000 Message-ID: <1c505d7a47c94f3ca8771c96a8850bc9@intel.com> References: <1606376006-74996-1-git-send-email-zhiminx.huang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1606376006-74996-1-git-send-email-zhiminx.huang@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] doc/dts_gsg/sys_reqs:add known issue after update scapy 2.4.4 X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > *.compare scapy 2.4.4 with 2.4.3 and support new packet layer. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Zhimin Huang Applied