According to the dpdk commit 1945c64674(app/testpmd: perform SW IP
checksum for GRO/GSO packets) and commit 8ba1723783(net/vhost:
perform SW checksum in Tx path), no need to modify DPDK code to test.

Signed-off-by: Wei Ling <weix.ling@intel.com>
---
 ...virtio_user_as_exceptional_path_test_plan.rst | 16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test_plans/virtio_user_as_exceptional_path_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/virtio_user_as_exceptional_path_test_plan.rst
index e1d2feb2..81399ea2 100644
--- a/test_plans/virtio_user_as_exceptional_path_test_plan.rst
+++ b/test_plans/virtio_user_as_exceptional_path_test_plan.rst
@@ -10,22 +10,6 @@ This test plan will test exceptional path with virtio_user and measure throughpu
 Prerequisites
 =============
 
-Modify the testpmd code as following::
-
-    --- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
-    +++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
-    @@ -693,10 +693,12 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
-                     * and inner headers */
-                    eth_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(m, struct ether_hdr *);
-    +#if 0
-                    ether_addr_copy(&peer_eth_addrs[fs->peer_addr],
-                                    &eth_hdr->d_addr);
-                    ether_addr_copy(&ports[fs->tx_port].eth_addr,
-                                    &eth_hdr->s_addr);
-    +#endif
-                    parse_ethernet(eth_hdr, &info);
-                    l3_hdr = (char *)eth_hdr + info.l2_len;
-
 Test Case1:test exceptional path with virtio_user
 =================================================
 Flow:tap0-->vhost-net-->virtio_user-->nic0-->nic1
-- 
2.25.1