From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C1DA052A; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 06:27:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0226B24024B; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 06:27:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72422240241 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 06:27:42 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: fHiv2MpqL8u2sUVtlHoiwZSSwseMXUJY9wxenOiVbeYjTkW/L4A3psBEgPcfhmvIZZGGuqqbjG TJE+4PDNNTfQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9882"; a="177291525" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,394,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="177291525" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2021 21:27:40 -0800 IronPort-SDR: rqNE/prjr9HFiVZj1g9wZzS2pbkc8nWgU2PIBcQ7F1Oipom6QL8gbpJtA2xGJOLRZaN6ECFgxU S3o/36xqWrbQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,394,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="507164576" Received: from fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.84]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2021 21:27:40 -0800 Received: from shsmsx605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) by fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 21:27:39 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:27:37 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:27:37 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "ohilyard@iol.unh.edu" , "dts@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH] meson compile: Improve compile times Thread-Index: AQHW8ODNs0x44IvAMka6NkIqHB35ZKpEZlQQ Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 05:27:37 +0000 Message-ID: <2a17d6ee014544bf980c8bc4d9779228@intel.com> References: <20210122170529.672048-1-ohilyard@iol.unh.edu> In-Reply-To: <20210122170529.672048-1-ohilyard@iol.unh.edu> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH] meson compile: Improve compile times X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > Increased compile timeout > Removed workers parameter from ninja compilation command >=20 > After a review of CI metrics, we noticed that dts runtimes had increased = greatly > over the last few months. A review of recent logs showed timeouts for > compiling dpdk. Upon review, we discovered that, if the "dut_cores" param= eter > is not set in conf/crbs.cfg, then dts uses the default value, which is a = single core, > as the core list. The number of cores in this list was then used the numb= er of > workers for ninja. This causes DTS to attempt to compile DPDK serially, r= esulting > in greatly increased compile times. The IOL's development machine saw a 3= 0x > compile speed increase from the included changes. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Owen Hilyard Applied, thanks =