From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A44591E for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:04:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2017 06:04:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,214,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="828916438" Received: from stv-crb-56.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.128.116]) ([10.239.128.116]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2017 06:04:52 -0800 Message-ID: <58B43044.1020803@intel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:57:24 +0800 From: "Liu, Yong" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xueqin Lin , dts@dpdk.org References: <1488169000-9260-1-git-send-email-xueqin.lin@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1488169000-9260-1-git-send-email-xueqin.lin@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH v2] test plan: add tx preparation test plan X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:04:55 -0000 Hi Qin, About the item 3, I haven't found it in DPDK documentation. Is it just hardware limitation? On 02/27/2017 12:16 PM, Xueqin Lin wrote: > +Note: > +Generally TSO only supports TCP packets and unsupports UDP packets due to > +hardware segmentation. If packet can not be segmented, it may happen below > +behavior:: > +1. Packet is not sent with a tx_burst > +2. Packet is sent, but not segmented > +3. Content of packet was changed in random way