From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD27A04B5; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:55:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16472BD3; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:55:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD6E2B9D for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:55:30 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: tX1EU7aMhCT3B2/tCD5pfqJaE6SMC+o1vnCSZX//bYxinaog1KkGDzMsyQ5NLESLvBxQ3iJI7H 1tcICnKegKGw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9786"; a="185786360" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,423,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="185786360" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Oct 2020 01:55:29 -0700 IronPort-SDR: w+as/IWacAdgQfdIm0CpIBZ5CvINbNP7E14CUQ3GyFkfbXy2w6k4lqwPgI5+OvrEu7katpbUs9 o5njV5lLNbpA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,423,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="424354752" Received: from fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.83]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2020 01:55:29 -0700 Received: from shsmsx602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) by fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 01:55:28 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:55:27 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:55:27 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Sun, QinX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Sun, QinX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/TestSuite_veb_switch.py modify cores list, vf-vf switch case must contain core0 Thread-Index: AQHWpfBRUw38JQjeuEikhqCX06rH+6mrMTFg Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 08:55:27 +0000 Message-ID: <70d58f24cbd14933b1519cde80946809@intel.com> References: <20201020081110.654223-1-qinx.sun@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201020081110.654223-1-qinx.sun@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/TestSuite_veb_switch.py modify cores list, vf-vf switch case must contain core0 X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" Subject format should be tests/veb_switch: xxxxxxxx Why must contain core0, does dpdk require it? > + self.pmdout.start_testpmd([0,1,2,3], prefix=3D"test1", > + ports=3D[self.sriov_vfs_port[0].pci], param=3D"--eth-peer=3D0,%s" % > + self.vf1_mac) Check firstly before use them, in case don't have enough resource.