From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29839A04E6; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:31:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CB15937; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:31:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A0E4C90 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:31:55 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: jqx33Hkn4xC5C9p1m7Uq3+Fy+pBGppf3Ilxlu08bQ4vFhtvgPzP0tP0kt7jG3afa8vz6cR3TA0 320KDFvWaw8w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9808"; a="150328701" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,486,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="150328701" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Nov 2020 19:31:53 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 8dmEYP0EqpPBdCRA9T8bX/Z2dGV5+PUzaaqXbUfYc92RMj2q98nj+LVAWov3yhVrHCM5lX9N1s F2SEd3s0IvuQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,486,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="330309942" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2020 19:31:53 -0800 Received: from shsmsx604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:31:52 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:31:50 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:31:50 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Han, YingyaX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Han, YingyaX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1]tests/vf_single_core: fix the result of vf_single_core is overwritten Thread-Index: AQHWu76OW7/2+nmdrUGR+w1xrgKWI6nNPyuQ Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:31:50 +0000 Message-ID: <72ea911263674803b13dc467075fe01a@intel.com> References: <20201116021156.63815-1-yingyax.han@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201116021156.63815-1-yingyax.han@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1]tests/vf_single_core: fix the result of vf_single_core is overwritten X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > duplicated with nic_single_core suite. >=20 > Signed-off-by: hanyingya Applied