From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90CCA052A; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:00:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E17EF90; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:00:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD972AB for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:00:01 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: lmzDhBs4UJmJqx5huuoDt4C1qXBsr+aurHqSu4ITo2ANMJUeUZsIZ7mS/pZHy/G7rH00fT5p/w +Pn0njwcusFA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9801"; a="157093774" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,468,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="157093774" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Nov 2020 19:00:00 -0800 IronPort-SDR: TJsfqxPPZqhmBWfqBmoS66l4rTiyRnpeCtlFDnail1yBoMuGUahlNWdr+7VWbbHmpKzFTWWPQs 6Qj6n3gnBHgA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,468,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="541598868" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2020 19:00:00 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:59:59 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:59:58 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:59:58 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Zhao, HaiyangX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Zhao, HaiyangX" Thread-Topic: [dts][PATCH V1 0/2] framework: fix the issue of eal param may be duplicated Thread-Index: AQHWtCO9fz+MhQfkmU6RcWqgkO84QqnCRHng Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:59:58 +0000 Message-ID: <75e5c4cee5f6406db17da634d5651b81@intel.com> References: <20201106095535.5650-1-haiyangx.zhao@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201106095535.5650-1-haiyangx.zhao@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1 0/2] framework: fix the issue of eal param may be duplicated X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" >=20 > *.The eal parameter will be duplicated when rx_mode is setted > in execution.cfg and suites, this patchset is to fix this issue. >=20 > Haiyang Zhao (2): > framework/pmd_output: add other eal param into config > framework/dut: add check if the rx mode eal param is duplicate > *.ignore the rx mode config in execution.cfg if the rx mode is > setted in suites. >=20 > framework/dut.py | 17 +++++++++-------- > framework/pmd_output.py | 1 + > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >=20 Reviewed-by: Lijuan Tu Applied