From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C770532D for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:40:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Aug 2017 00:40:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,356,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="888915875" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Aug 2017 00:40:15 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:40:15 -0700 Received: from shsmsx151.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.50) by FMSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:40:15 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.183]) by SHSMSX151.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.25]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:40:13 +0800 From: "Xu, Qian Q" To: "Liu, Yong" , "Xu, HuilongX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Xu, HuilongX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1] discard malloc unit test case Thread-Index: AQHTEnFX6rlG4RiTh0u/OlqR+l3UUaJ+Pp+AgACGWKA= Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:40:12 +0000 Message-ID: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3B71E5DA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1502435592-66417-1-git-send-email-huilongx.xu@intel.com> <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E62E51D35@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E62E51D35@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZjQ3ZTY2MzYtNzc0Zi00YWQ0LTg2NjUtODkxOGFiNjBmMjE0IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjUuOS4zIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Imp5clR1U1pGQlhoVDI2TnZxNlVtVEI0dFBUSVwvVmpYOENlakorSE5mUXR3PSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 10.0.102.7 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] discard malloc unit test case X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:40:17 -0000 But seems this case is invalid from dev's view. Is it the case, Huilong?=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Yong > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 3:38 PM > To: Xu, HuilongX ; dts@dpdk.org > Cc: Xu, HuilongX > Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] discard malloc unit test case >=20 > Huilong, > Malloc autotest still existing in dpdk code. Please check again. >=20 > Thank, > Marvin >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of xu,huilong > > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 3:13 PM > > To: dts@dpdk.org > > Cc: Xu, HuilongX > > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] discard malloc unit test case > > > > in new dpdk code, malloc unit test case discard already, so should > > remove this case in test suitein new dpdk code, malloc unit test case > > discard already, so should remove > > > > Signed-off-by: xu,huilong