From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yong.liu@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F53C3BE
 for <dts@dpdk.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:24:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jul 2015 21:24:05 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,506,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="526951082"
Received: from pgsmsx103.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.82])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jul 2015 21:24:05 -0700
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by
 PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:24:03 +0800
Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.46]) by
 shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.165]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002;
 Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:24:02 +0800
From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: "Fan, ChangruX" <changrux.fan@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: Debug vlan and dual_vlan failed cases
Thread-Index: AdC+7Cwo27Pdu3SZTe6Nulk/cC2BYwAgz8QgAAtNWxAAvbQXYAADnW6g
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 04:24:01 +0000
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E10E65002@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <84799DAADE9E2A44834F0D0FF8A61A914BE7D6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <DF2A19295B96364286FEB7F3DDA27A460112DF81@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <84799DAADE9E2A44834F0D0FF8A61A914BE9E4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <84799DAADE9E2A44834F0D0FF8A61A914BEE76@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <84799DAADE9E2A44834F0D0FF8A61A914BEE76@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dts] Debug vlan and dual_vlan failed cases
X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions <dts.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dts>,
 <mailto:dts-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dts/>
List-Post: <mailto:dts@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dts-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dts>,
 <mailto:dts-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 04:24:06 -0000

Hi Changru,
Can you send your patch just with plain txt? And please fix the pep8 issue =
in the suite, now I have to reform your patch.=20

From: Fan, ChangruX=20
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 10:31 AM
To: Liu, Yong; dts@dpdk.org
Subject: FW: Debug vlan and dual_vlan failed cases

Hi Yong
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=20
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Attach files are the patch for vlan and dual_vlan.

Thanks=20
changru

From: Fan, ChangruX=20
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 3:56 PM
To: Xu, HuilongX
Cc: Chen, WeichunX
Subject: RE: Debug vlan and dual_vlan failed cases

Hi huilong,

I have removed the annotation. Please check.

Thanks


From: Xu, HuilongX=20
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:33 AM
To: Fan, ChangruX; Xu, HuilongX
Cc: Chen, WeichunX
Subject: RE: Debug vlan and dual_vlan failed cases

Hi changru,
I check your patch already, could you remove the annotation in your patch, =
because some annotation is debug info.
Thanks =A0a lot

From: Fan, ChangruX=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 6:57 PM
To: Xu, HuilongX; dts@dpdk.org
Subject: Debug vlan and dual_vlan failed cases

Hi huilong
=A0=A0=A0=20
  After apply the patch, the vlan and dual_vlan can passed testing.
 =20
changru