From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: "Xu, HuilongX" <huilongx.xu@intel.com>, "dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dts] [V1 1/5] update case execute sequence for 10G nic
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 03:09:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E10F2DFD4@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DF2A19295B96364286FEB7F3DDA27A4637A90AA7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Huilong, we should figure out the root cause of scatter case for not only us run DTS by now.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, HuilongX
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:40 AM
> To: Liu, Yong; dts@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dts] [V1 1/5] update case execute sequence for 10G nic
>
> Hi yong,
> Yes, sometimes scatter will failed in daily test, but when we debug, it
> passed, if only run scatter.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Liu, Yong
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:30 AM
> > To: Xu, HuilongX; dts@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [dts] [V1 1/5] update case execute sequence for 10G nic
> >
> > Huilong,
> > Why do you change the sequence of suite execution? Is there any special
> > reason to run scatter as the first one?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of xu,huilong
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:12 AM
> > > To: dts@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [dts] [V1 1/5] update case execute sequence for 10G nic
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: xu,huilong <huilongx.xu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > executions/execution.cfg | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/executions/execution.cfg b/executions/execution.cfg
> > > index 20d9bd6..5daf2df 100644
> > > --- a/executions/execution.cfg
> > > +++ b/executions/execution.cfg
> > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > > crbs=<CRB IP Address>
> > > drivername=<driver name igb_uio or vfio-pci>
> > > test_suites=
> > > + scatter,
> > > cmdline,
> > > hello_world,
> > > multiprocess,
> > > @@ -22,10 +23,8 @@ test_suites=
> > > shutdown_api,
> > > fdir,
> > > ipv4_reassembly,
> > > - scatter,
> > > pmdrssreta,
> > > pmd,
> > > - l2fwd,
> > > kni
> > > targets=
> > > x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
> > > --
> > > 1.9.3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-20 2:11 xu,huilong
2015-10-20 2:11 ` [dts] [V1 2/5] update case execute sequence for 40G nic xu,huilong
2015-10-20 2:11 ` [dts] [V1 3/5] update case execute sequence for rxmode test xu,huilong
2015-10-20 2:11 ` [dts] [V1 4/5] update case execute sequence for smock test xu,huilong
2015-10-20 2:11 ` [dts] [V1 5/5] add time for multiprocess app setup xu,huilong
2015-10-20 2:30 ` [dts] [V1 1/5] update case execute sequence for 10G nic Liu, Yong
2015-10-20 2:39 ` Xu, HuilongX
2015-10-20 3:09 ` Liu, Yong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E10F2DFD4@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=yong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dts@dpdk.org \
--cc=huilongx.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).