From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: "Fu, JingguoX" <jingguox.fu@intel.com>, "dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>
Cc: Jingguo Fu <jingguox.fu@intel.comwq>
Subject: Re: [dts] [DTS][PATCH 1/2] unit test: add memcpy performance unit test plan
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 01:05:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E145056CE@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457416106-17525-1-git-send-email-jingguox.fu@intel.com>
Jingguo, some comments below.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fu, JingguoX
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 1:48 PM
> To: dts@dpdk.org
> Cc: Liu, Yong; Xu, Qian Q; Jingguo Fu
> Subject: [DTS][PATCH 1/2] unit test: add memcpy performance unit test
> plan
>
> From: Jingguo Fu <jingguox.fu@intel.comwq>
>
> case name: memcpy_perf_analysis
> it will show four ratio value for the performance
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingguo Fu <jingguox.fu@intel.comwq>
> ---
> test_plans/unit_tests_memcpy_perf_test_plan.rst | 69
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 test_plans/unit_tests_memcpy_perf_test_plan.rst
>
> diff --git a/test_plans/unit_tests_memcpy_perf_test_plan.rst
> b/test_plans/unit_tests_memcpy_perf_test_plan.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..35b646b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test_plans/unit_tests_memcpy_perf_test_plan.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +.. Copyright (c) <2010, 2016>, Intel Corporation
> + All rights reserved.
> +
> + Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> + modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> + are met:
> +
> + - Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> + notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> +
> + - Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> + notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> + the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> + distribution.
> +
> + - Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
> + contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
> + from this software without specific prior written permission.
> +
> + THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> + "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> + LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS
> + FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
> + COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT,
> + INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
> + (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
> + SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
> + HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
> + STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
> + ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED
> + OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> +
> +======================
> +Test suite description
> +======================
> +
> +This document is for dpdk unit test: memcpy performance auto test.
> +For this suite, manily aims to analysis the cache to cache memcopy
Typo, should be "mainly" and "memcpy".
> +performance after run the memcpy performance unit test.
> +
> +The performance data is divided into four parts. Each part has two
> +colums data for cache to cache performance. After extract the data,
Could you show one basic sample for performance data, it’s hard to understand from your description.
> +compute the geomatric mean for each colum, and then let the second
> +geomatric divide the first goematric mean, then get the ratio of the
> +two geomatric means.
> +
> +if the ratio greater than 1, then the test got a great performance.
> +
> +
> +=============
> +Prerequisites
> +=============
> +
> +Test Case: memcpy_perf_analysis
> +===============================
> +
> +1. run memcpy_perf unit test
> + ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/test -c f -n 1
> + memcpy_perf_autotest
> + quit
> + performance data stored in memcpy_perf_auto.log file
> +
> +2. copy log file to current server
> +3. analysis the data
> ++--------------------+-----------------------+------------------+-------
> --------------+
> +| 32B Aligned(ticks) | 32B Aligned CT(ticks) | Unaligned(ticks) |
> Unaligned CT(ticks) |
> ++====================+=======================+==================+=======
> ==============+
> +| 1.893 | 2.509 | 1.507 | 1.500
> |
> ++--------------------+-----------------------+------------------+-------
> --------------+
Could you give basic description of "CT", it’s hard to understand the meaning of it.
> --
> 1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 5:48 Jingguo Fu
2016-03-08 5:48 ` [dts] [DTS][PATCH 2/2] unit test: add memcpy performance unit test case Jingguo Fu
2016-03-09 1:05 ` Liu, Yong [this message]
2016-03-10 8:36 ` [dts] [DTS][PATCH 1/2] unit test: add memcpy performance unit test plan Fu, JingguoX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E145056CE@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=yong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dts@dpdk.org \
--cc=jingguox.fu@intel.com \
--cc=jingguox.fu@intel.comwq \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).