From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: "Xu, HuilongX" <huilongx.xu@intel.com>, "dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V2][dts 2/2] add allmutlicast and broadcast test case
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 17:13:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E14F1B175@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DF2A19295B96364286FEB7F3DDA27A4637B3D678@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Thanks, please modify failure reason as requested.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, HuilongX
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 6:49 PM
> To: Liu, Yong; dts@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dts] [PATCH V2][dts 2/2] add allmutlicast and broadcast test
> case
>
> Please see my comments.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Liu, Yong
> > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 1:48 AM
> > To: Xu, HuilongX; dts@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Xu, HuilongX
> > Subject: RE: [dts] [PATCH V2][dts 2/2] add allmutlicast and broadcast
> > test case
> >
> > Thanks, one question below.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of xu,huilong
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 11:03 PM
> > > To: dts@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Xu, HuilongX
> > > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V2][dts 2/2] add allmutlicast and broadcast test
> > > case
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: xu,huilong <huilongx.xu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/TestSuite_dynamic_config.py | 69
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > -----
> > > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/TestSuite_dynamic_config.py
> > > b/tests/TestSuite_dynamic_config.py
> > > index ba740b1..380fa6d 100644
> > > --- a/tests/TestSuite_dynamic_config.py
> > > +++ b/tests/TestSuite_dynamic_config.py
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > > # BSD LICENSE
> > > #
> > > -# Copyright(c) 2010-2015 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > > +# Copyright(c) 2010-2016 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > > # All rights reserved.
> > > #
> > > # Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > > @@ -67,18 +67,12 @@ class TestDynamicConfig(TestCase):
> > > print self.dut_ports
> > >
> > > # Verify that enough ports are available
> > > - if self.nic in ["fortville_eagle", "fortville_spirit",
> > > "fortville_spirit_single"]:
> > > - self.verify(len(self.dut_ports) >= 2, "Insufficient
> > ports")
> > > - else:
> > > - self.verify(len(self.dut_ports) >= 1, "Insufficient
> > ports")
> > > + self.verify(len(self.dut_ports) >= 2, "Insufficient ports")
> > >
> > > # Prepare cores and ports
> > > cores = self.dut.get_core_list('1S/2C/2T')
> > > coreMask = dts.create_mask(cores)
> > > - if self.nic in ["fortville_eagle", "fortville_spirit",
> > > "fortville_spirit_single"]:
> > > - portMask = dts.create_mask(self.dut_ports[:2])
> > > - else:
> > > - portMask = dts.create_mask([self.dut_ports[0]])
> > > + portMask = dts.create_mask(self.dut_ports[:2])
> >
> > One question here, is this case must need two ports? Reduce port
> > requirement is our long time strategy.
> > It will benefit for some NIC which only one port available.
> Huilong's comments:
> One port received a packet, and the packet info not any changed, then
> send this packet by itself.
> Some nic not support this scenario. Example Fortville nic.
> >
> > >
> > > # launch app
> > > cmd = "./%s/build/app/test-pmd/testpmd -c %s -n 3 -- -i --
> > rxpt=0
> > > \
> > > @@ -99,8 +93,7 @@ class TestDynamicConfig(TestCase):
> > > self.verify(cmp(ret.lower(), self.dest) == 0, "MAC address
> > wrong")
> > > self.verify("Promiscuous mode: enabled" in out,
> > > "wrong default promiscuous value")
> > > - if self.nic in ["fortville_eagle", "fortville_spirit",
> > > "fortville_spirit_single"]:
> > > - self.dut.send_expect("start", "testpmd> ", 120)
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("start", "testpmd> ", 120)
> > >
> > > def dynamic_config_send_packet(self, portid,
> > > destMac="00:11:22:33:44:55"):
> > > """
> > > @@ -129,6 +122,7 @@ class TestDynamicConfig(TestCase):
> > > portid = self.dut_ports[0]
> > >
> > > # get the current rx statistic
> > > + out = self.dut.send_expect("clear port stats all" , "testpmd>
> > ")
> > > out = self.dut.send_expect("show port stats %d" % portid,
> > > "testpmd> ")
> > > cur_rxpkt = dts.regexp(out, "RX-packets: ([0-9]+)")
> > >
> > > @@ -211,7 +205,60 @@ class TestDynamicConfig(TestCase):
> > > # check the pakcet increasment
> > > self.verify(int(cur_rxpkt) == int(
> > > pre_rxpkt) + 1, "2nd packet increasment error")
> > > + def test_dynamic_config_broadcast(self):
> > > + """
> > > + Dynamic config disable promiscuous, send a broadcast packet
> > > + dpdk will received packet and fwd by io model. send a general
> > > packet
> > > + and dst mac not port mac, dpdk will not received packet.
> > > + """
> > > +
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("set promisc all off", "testpmd> ")
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("set fwd io", "testpmd> ")
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("clear port stats all", "testpmd> ")
> > > +
> > > +
> > > self.dynamic_config_send_packet(self.dut_ports[0],"ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff")
> > > + out = self.dut.send_expect(
> > > + "show port stats %d" % self.dut_ports[1], "testpmd> ")
> > > +
> > > + cur_rxpkt = dts.regexp(out, "TX-packets: ([0-9]+)")
> > > + self.verify(int(cur_rxpkt) == 1, "1st packet increasment
> > error")
> > > +
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("clear port stats all", "testpmd> ")
> > > +
> > > + self.dynamic_config_send_packet(self.dut_ports[0])
> > > + out = self.dut.send_expect(
> > > + "show port stats %d" % self.dut_ports[1], "testpmd> ")
> > > +
> > > + cur_rxpkt = dts.regexp(out, "TX-packets: ([0-9]+)")
> > > + self.verify(int(cur_rxpkt) == 0, "2st packet increasment
> > error")
> > > +
> > > + def test_dynamic_config_allmulticast(self):
> > > + """
> > > + Dynamic config disable promiscuous,when dpdk enable multicast,
> > > send a
> > > + mulicast packet, dpdk received this packet and fwd by io
> > model.
> > > when dpdk
> > > + disable multicast, dpdk not received this packet
> > > + """
> > > +
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("set promisc all off", "testpmd> ")
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("set fwd io", "testpmd> ")
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("clear port stats all", "testpmd> ")
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("set allmulti all on", "testpmd> ")
> > > +
> > > self.dynamic_config_send_packet(self.dut_ports[0],"01:00:00:33:00:01")
> > > + out = self.dut.send_expect(
> > > + "show port stats %d" % self.dut_ports[1], "testpmd> ")
> > > +
> > > + cur_rxpkt = dts.regexp(out, "TX-packets: ([0-9]+)")
> > > + self.verify(int(cur_rxpkt) == 1, "1st packet increasment
> > error")
The failure reason is not very clear, please changed something like "Can't receive multicast packet as expected."
> > > +
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("clear port stats all", "testpmd> ")
> > > + self.dut.send_expect("set allmulti all off", "testpmd> ")
> > > +
> > > self.dynamic_config_send_packet(self.dut_ports[0],"01:00:00:33:00:01")
> > > + out = self.dut.send_expect(
> > > + "show port stats %d" % self.dut_ports[1], "testpmd> ")
> > >
> > > + cur_rxpkt = dts.regexp(out, "TX-packets: ([0-9]+)")
> > > + self.verify(int(cur_rxpkt) == 0, "2st packet increasment
> > error")
The same as previous one.
> > > +
> > > def test_dynamic_config_enable_promiscuous(self):
> > > """
> > > Dynamic config enable promiscuous test
> > > --
> > > 1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-04 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-22 6:02 [dts] [PATCH V1][dts 1/2] add allmutlicast and broadcast test plan xu,huilong
2016-04-22 6:02 ` [dts] [PATCH V2][dts 2/2] add allmutlicast and broadcast test case xu,huilong
2016-04-29 17:48 ` Liu, Yong
2016-05-03 1:49 ` Xu, HuilongX
2016-05-04 17:13 ` Liu, Yong [this message]
2016-05-04 17:10 ` [dts] [PATCH V1][dts 1/2] add allmutlicast and broadcast test plan Liu, Yong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E14F1B175@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=yong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dts@dpdk.org \
--cc=huilongx.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).