Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] test_plans/efd: test plan revise

["Tu, Lijuan" <lijuan.tu@intel.com>]

Applied, thanks

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhe
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 6:14 AM
> To: dts@dpdk.org
> Cc: Wan, Zhe <zhe.wan@intel.com>
> Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] test_plans/efd: test plan revise
> 
> From: Zhe Wan <zhe.wan@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhe Wan <zhe.wan@intel.com>
> ---
>  test_plans/efd_test_plan.rst | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> -
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/test_plans/efd_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/efd_test_plan.rst index
> d6962e7..dfde28a 100644
> --- a/test_plans/efd_test_plan.rst
> +++ b/test_plans/efd_test_plan.rst
> @@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ Two ports connect to packet generator.
> 
>  DUT board must be two sockets system and each cpu have more than 16 lcores.
> 
> +Unit test cases
> +===================
> +
>  Test Case: EFD function unit test
>  ---------------------------------
>  Start test application and run efd unit test::
> @@ -77,28 +80,20 @@ Verify when key size increased, no significant increment
> in cpu cycles.
>  Verify when value bits increased, no significant increment in cpu cycles.
>  Compare with cuckoo hash performance result, lookup cycles should be less.
> 
> -Test Case: Load balancer performance based on EFD
> --------------------------------------------------
> +Performance test cases
> +==============================
>  In EFD sample, EFD work as a flow-level load balancer. Flows are received at  a
> front end server before being forwarded to the target back end server for
> processing. This case will measure the performance of flow distribution with
> different parameters.
> 
> -Value bits: number of bits of value that be stored in EFD table
>  Nodes: number of back end nodes
>  Entries: number of flows to be added in EFD table
> +Value bits: number of bits of value that be stored in EFD table
> 
> -+--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> -| Value Bits   | Nodes | Entries   | Throughput |
> -+--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> -|  8           |   2   |    2M     |            |
> -+--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> -|  16          |   2   |    2M     |            |
> -+--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> -|  24          |   2   |    2M     |            |
> -+--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> -|  32          |   2   |    2M     |            |
> -+--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> +Test Case: Load balancer performance based on node numbers
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +This case will measure the performance based on node numbers.
> 
>  +--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
>  | Value Bits   | Nodes | Entries   | Throughput |
> @@ -120,6 +115,10 @@ Entries: number of flows to be added in EFD table
>  |  8           |   8   |    2M     |            |
>  +--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> 
> +Test Case: Load balancer performance based on flow numbers
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +This case will measure the performance based on flow numbers.
> +
>  +--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
>  | Value Bits   | Nodes | Entries   | Throughput |
>  +--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> @@ -135,3 +134,19 @@ Entries: number of flows to be added in EFD table  +----
> ----------+-------+-----------+------------+
>  |  8           |   2   |    32M    |            |
>  +--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> +
> +Test Case: Load balancer performance based on value bits
> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +This case will measure the performance based on value bits.
> +
> ++--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> +| Value Bits   | Nodes | Entries   | Throughput |
> ++--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> +|  8           |   2   |    2M     |            |
> ++--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> +|  16          |   2   |    2M     |            |
> ++--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> +|  24          |   2   |    2M     |            |
> ++--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> +|  32          |   2   |    2M     |            |
> ++--------------+-------+-----------+------------+
> --
> 1.8.3.1