From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D8FA04B5; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 05:28:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2F41C069; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 05:28:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D013F137D for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 05:28:35 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: juclSScGjNy7Nufu60ipe2dv8tibpXRdsRfJP6yNwLquucua7PbdFf9l3v3cvijwPtXauXvtWR g39VuXxm+nTA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9731"; a="136828969" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,381,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="136828969" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2020 20:28:34 -0700 IronPort-SDR: s5y44P9MEw8ah6Fj4OVSgBpdft6HTyHLWIRd+JWozTFjUjKWfIk2CdyTRyhv96YpcqIMFc4ijL oiDWuj/XxiVQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,381,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="477464250" Received: from fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.84]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2020 20:28:34 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.84) by fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:28:31 -0700 Received: from shsmsx154.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.54) by fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:28:31 -0700 Received: from shsmsx107.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.141]) by SHSMSX154.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.115]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:28:28 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Peng, Yuan" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Peng, Yuan" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH] change 128 profiles case due to dpdk code update Thread-Index: AQHWgMsYyeia3FYdakK3F3+dq/K5xKlUsJPw Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 03:28:27 +0000 Message-ID: <8CE3E05A3F976642AAB0F4675D0AD20E0C656B40@SHSMSX107.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1599036748-32869-1-git-send-email-yuan.peng@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1599036748-32869-1-git-send-email-yuan.peng@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH] change 128 profiles case due to dpdk code update X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > Subject: [dts] [PATCH] change 128 profiles case due to dpdk code update >=20 > iavf_fdir test plan and script update due to DPDK code update: > if there is not corresponding rule existing, the profile will be deleted. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Peng Yuan Applied