* Re: [dts] [PATCH v1]test_plans: remove per queue stats check
2020-11-26 14:46 [dts] [PATCH v1]test_plans: remove per queue stats check Peng Yuan
@ 2020-11-26 8:33 ` Tu, Lijuan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tu, Lijuan @ 2020-11-26 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng, Yuan, dts; +Cc: Peng, Yuan
> FVL does not support hardware per queue stats, so remove the per queue
> stats check from test plan.
>
> Signed-off-by: pengyuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>
Applied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [dts] [PATCH v1]test_plans: remove per queue stats check
@ 2020-11-26 14:46 Peng Yuan
2020-11-26 8:33 ` Tu, Lijuan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peng Yuan @ 2020-11-26 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dts; +Cc: pengyuan
From: pengyuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>
FVL does not support hardware per queue stats,
so remove the per queue stats check from test plan.
Signed-off-by: pengyuan <yuan.peng@intel.com>
diff --git a/test_plans/stats_checks_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/stats_checks_test_plan.rst
index e571cb34..f314ba88 100644
--- a/test_plans/stats_checks_test_plan.rst
+++ b/test_plans/stats_checks_test_plan.rst
@@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ The fields checked are RX-packets and TX-packets of each queue stats,
RX-packets, RX-bytes, TX-packets and TX-bytes of each port stats,
rx_good_packets and rx_good_bytes of each port xstats,
tx_good_packets and tx_good_bytes of each port xstats,
-rx_qx_packets, rx_qx_bytes, tx_qx_packets and tx_qx_bytes of each port xstats.
+FVL does not support hardware per queue stats,
+so we won't check rx and tx per queue stats.
Test Case: PF xstatus Checks
============================
@@ -210,17 +211,17 @@ Test Case: PF xstatus Checks
rx_good_bytes: 6000
tx_good_bytes: 0
......
- rx_q0_packets: 29
- rx_q0_bytes: 1740
+ rx_q0_packets: 0
+ rx_q0_bytes: 0
rx_q0_errors: 0
- rx_q1_packets: 21
- rx_q1_bytes: 1260
+ rx_q1_packets: 0
+ rx_q1_bytes: 0
rx_q1_errors: 0
- rx_q2_packets: 24
- rx_q2_bytes: 1440
+ rx_q2_packets: 0
+ rx_q2_bytes: 0
rx_q2_errors: 0
- rx_q3_packets: 26
- rx_q3_bytes: 1560
+ rx_q3_packets: 0
+ rx_q3_bytes: 0
rx_q3_errors: 0
tx_q0_packets: 0
tx_q0_bytes: 0
@@ -248,21 +249,20 @@ Test Case: PF xstatus Checks
rx_q3_packets: 0
rx_q3_bytes: 0
rx_q3_errors: 0
- tx_q0_packets: 29
- tx_q0_bytes: 1740
- tx_q1_packets: 21
- tx_q1_bytes: 1260
- tx_q2_packets: 24
- tx_q2_bytes: 1440
- tx_q3_packets: 26
- tx_q3_bytes: 1560
+ tx_q0_packets: 0
+ tx_q0_bytes: 0
+ tx_q1_packets: 0
+ tx_q1_bytes: 0
+ tx_q2_packets: 0
+ tx_q2_bytes: 0
+ tx_q3_packets: 0
+ tx_q3_bytes: 0
verify rx_good_packets, RX-packets of port 0 and tx_good_packets, TX-packets of port 1 are both 100.
rx_good_bytes, RX-bytes of port 0 and tx_good_bytes, TX-bytes of port 1 are the same.
-RX-packets of each queue of port 0 are equal to rx_qx_packets of each queue of port 0.
-TX-packets of each queue of port 1 are equal to tx_qx_packets of each queue of port 1.
-The sum of rx_qx_bytes of each queue of port 0 is equal to the rx_good_packets of port 0.
-The sum of tx_qx_bytes of each queue of port 1 is equal to the tx_good_packets of port 1.
+FVL does not support hardware per queue stats,
+so rx_qx_packets and rx_qx_bytes are both 0.
+tx_qx_packets and tx_qx_bytes are both 0 too.
Test Case: VF xstats Checks
============================
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-26 8:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-26 14:46 [dts] [PATCH v1]test_plans: remove per queue stats check Peng Yuan
2020-11-26 8:33 ` Tu, Lijuan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).