From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F628567F
 for <dts@dpdk.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:04:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2015 09:04:54 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,511,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="559873135"
Received: from irsmsx106.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.31])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2015 09:04:53 -0700
Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.251]) by
 IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002;
 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:04:52 +0100
From: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
To: sys_stv <sys_stv@intel.com>, "Chen, WeichunX" <weichunx.chen@intel.com>,
 "Tang, HaifengX" <haifengx.tang@intel.com>, "Mo, YufengX"
 <yufengx.mo@intel.com>, "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>,
 "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "dts@dpdk.org"
 <dts@dpdk.org>, "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>, "Cao, Waterman"
 <waterman.cao@intel.com>, "Dong, Shide" <shide.dong@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [dts] |ERROR|pw 7007 [dpdk-dev, v4,	1/1] ip_frag: fix creating
 ipv6 fragment extension header
Thread-Index: AQHQ68dksDai57o4hEqFZPy6IvDzQZ43fYfg
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:04:52 +0000
Message-ID: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE202339D55@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <e9ea37$nsaeh8@orsmga002.jf.intel.com> <2839858.oV9no64RkK@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <2839858.oV9no64RkK@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dts] |ERROR|pw 7007 [dpdk-dev, v4,
 1/1] ip_frag: fix creating ipv6 fragment extension header
X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions <dts.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dts>,
 <mailto:dts-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dts/>
List-Post: <mailto:dts@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dts-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dts>,
 <mailto:dts-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:04:56 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:14 AM
> To: sys_stv
> Cc: Dong, Shide; dts@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dts] |ERROR|pw 7007 [dpdk-dev, v4, 1/1] ip_frag: fix
> creating ipv6 fragment extension header
>=20
> Thanks for doing some automatic tests.
> Please do not pollute dts list with test reports and use the appropriate
> list
> instead: test-report@dpdk.org.
>=20
> I think the report would be better readable if there was no array.
> The key/value format is easier and more compact. Example:
> 	Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:09:17 +0200
> 	OS: Fedora
> 	Failed DTS case: http://dpdk.org/browse/tools/dts/...

Hi,

Good work on the automated testing. It is really nice to see that working n=
ow.

I agree with Thomas about the array/table format of the report. It is a lit=
tle hard to read.=20

I also agree that a key/value format like the example above would be better=
.

John.
--=20