From: Khadem Ullah <14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk>
To: dts@dpdk.org
Subject: Performance degradation when using Multi-Packet Receive Queue (MPRQ)
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 12:08:15 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA++2-x7+aAgyZvK2hqmEtw3FON1JLcUu7GyXWvOCnyQuKdvTjA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 453 bytes --]
Hi, Hope you are doing well.
There is some performance degradation when using MPRQ on the receiving side
even for a small packet size.
I have generated traffic from a remote of a packet size of 64 bytes, in fwd
mode flowgen, with all the performance parameters as in
https://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_22_11_NVIDIA_Mellanox_NIC_performance_report.pdf
.
Mellanox card: Connect-x6
dpdk 22.11 version.
on MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2
Regards,
Khadem
--
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 895 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2023-06-21 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA++2-x7+aAgyZvK2hqmEtw3FON1JLcUu7GyXWvOCnyQuKdvTjA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=14pwcse1224@uetpeshawar.edu.pk \
--cc=dts@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).