From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCE9A0A0F; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:37:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CAD4127D; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:37:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531EA4127A for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:37:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625067475; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=dSSwcvzTUjXbT4RWI5Z13YsbocAoeBMOSeQnYtpbqLo=; b=aHILoSFEy92aDp6aldbAF2etHa9uFyJbWgUNRUU9Yq8CVVz+GxsWTO5F0x4krJPX6VFJTi dvbhL1MA4edgXGziD3dH+AEPmvFeYuq2Kjy9LHFG58Wm3r0uJ+d/A/crFCFobwtZpDvxHj GYXgE0RVp11Z1qx3UB4Fu18qlKebnaQ= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-97-49WEt0sOOPmBFjBNBZ36Jw-1; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:37:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 49WEt0sOOPmBFjBNBZ36Jw-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id v15-20020a67c00f0000b029023607a23f3dso1107982vsi.10 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dSSwcvzTUjXbT4RWI5Z13YsbocAoeBMOSeQnYtpbqLo=; b=KBoju+1oVZl1CNXRtQMFjh2KB/NVrhJfGHnMcvg4Legw+EBm7zAoAri4m+f/0JmofF hIg6UPJdTBJVPVV2wO47KW0YVPZWpuKNAF1OA6Aj/QLhPz6qaLnnhIJl85a72KmAtaIa w0PTZcfOX8yrLRbZz8wxAPLYoq647CsULCEr5OpT6D3VwyXBpwYf7D93LBkMnXtqdamC axt4RzF1T5cgsQ2p14wXb3f2gNlFYj4Kw/gmH2yYCMhTpJt+dUDhT1rDJII/CcTalMJ4 IHU+FT1ehgjX4jC1KrHlYOUzcY8dghfw/+VMevpRBrZaQna/TmeImkBjx1fnGh5W12wG BxbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530TWaOxcYMNgWctJ8TvFgL2Tz+42sVIG1piSzvA6DDTeQwJUSXk 4X9t8wXAJfkrBvG1NFDVKnworp72pYABVAzAfiP3vZhshHChm7zo+NklUAB6Wc3nx6ASU1pIwTw vJmw11bdVgN2iNFffLMU= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fe90:: with SMTP id b16mr31541431vsr.5.1625067472014; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxukYNjvRDY6+WPegohNdBvQ5VX+OAkL2B4scbsTmFjkDwMEdTeQ7ne5AcXpIdaicnM0jkqw0yZpPdbMFoF3GA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fe90:: with SMTP id b16mr31541404vsr.5.1625067471851; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:37:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:37:40 +0200 Message-ID: To: dpdklab Cc: ci@dpdk.org, dts@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , Lincoln Lavoie Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [dts] Failures for nic_single_core test X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" Hello guys, Since 06/28, I see the nic_single_core test failing most of the time with the system hosting the i40e nic. I suspect this has something to do with a recent change with reporting performance difference in DTS, could you have a look and confirm? -- David Marchand