From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com (mail-yw0-f179.google.com [209.85.161.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68E758CE for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 07:06:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r204so213048289ywb.0 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:06:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rPBoKvWnNstDaaKiigJuUTZNtwzD2JukfvDP3MoNftM=; b=BGqLG+rEgI/aoCipjeOJWsvZWxMXm2DeLAE7iMYJ+zIxeiejIjg6Mw2qlP1eRBfesB QdnCaJsPyCJieYZAlgLbPKDWn+nmY5Bozdve2dt+VQbkeUFW1ojjLqksVT47fefGASVN ThXOml+suSK/Qikh8Nf/2uNCM2F+jynv49ehc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rPBoKvWnNstDaaKiigJuUTZNtwzD2JukfvDP3MoNftM=; b=V7R2fq6tLbNejjSpoH3f6THA0sJzmhsIAJ6kj2mfdmADEhrCCF5SB2RsI5cJ93tP6+ B3plSOBvDX9UFchVoPQPLDFyu9wTkj1jqhTPjTnxvdq2LaqTTaok0kXrN8SDdYWg/gy6 QYm4qKJan8nRf8GNUoJH4/paGSqD2D82mNaJGkymBL7ASSJOO/jEgq/G5v9bJpFUdXMt t2QTRphXtc+viEWSkmBpSUd0eTGp94g7FPBB5A7r1u06N1S8+p1u0aTlKCghNF52wBAq Dm8qAlBf4BvT/dxP8NAUzvTujOD0kqp94HT15opAqL0U7ooE+NqLKpGdqgbsAdxFD+9U i6JQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00XmM/8DVUADTsPzg6K8j4Vv8mGFwLdzSvQcAMkghRRI+shc4vqoF4Nv/CSzLynL/7RSTxKtFmnlDd6+PrQ X-Received: by 10.129.53.139 with SMTP id c133mr43492996ywa.70.1480658806105; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:06:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.193.131 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 22:06:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E6033561C@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1480646757-13829-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E6033532C@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E6033561C@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Jianbo Liu Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:06:45 +0800 Message-ID: To: "Liu, Yong" Cc: "dts@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH] tests mac_filter: use scapy to send packets X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 06:06:47 -0000 On 2 December 2016 at 13:44, Liu, Yong wrote: > Jianbo, could you explain your usage model? We are now running DTS on tester machine. > We want to integrate it into our CI environment. If running DTS on tester, it's very hard to setup. How does Intel setup these automation testings? >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jianbo Liu [mailto:jianbo.liu@linaro.org] >> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 11:45 AM >> To: Liu, Yong >> Cc: dts@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH] tests mac_filter: use scapy to send packets >> >> Hi Marvin, >> >> On 2 December 2016 at 11:27, Liu, Yong wrote: >> > Hi Jianbo, >> > Packet module is one abstract layer based on scapy. We abstracted this >> layer for monitoring scapy process and integrating sniff/configuration >> function. >> > It should work the same as scapy command. I'm interesting in why your >> intended to use scapy replace of Packet module. >> > >> I assume dts can be run on a different machine from tester. Am I right? >> But I got the following error, as the module sends packets through its >> local port, not the tester's port, but they are different if dts is >> not run on tester machine. > > Yes, that's our original plan. But based on time efficiency and real usage model, we assume > Tester and DTS will use same machine. > >