From: "Xu, HuilongX" <huilongx.xu@intel.com>
To: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>, "dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] update dump test suite
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 05:47:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DF2A19295B96364286FEB7F3DDA27A4637B9096F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E2226B626@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi yong,
Two comments.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liu, Yong
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:14 PM
> To: Xu, HuilongX; dts@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xu, HuilongX
> Subject: RE: [dts] [PATCH V1] update dump test suite
>
> Huilong, two comments below.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of xu,huilong
> > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 4:11 PM
> > To: dts@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Xu, HuilongX
> > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] update dump test suite
> >
> > update list:
> > 1. discard test_log_dump, because this function remove in dpdk.org
> > 2. update ring_dump/mempool_dump case, ignore get ring/mempool struct
> info.
> > because ring struct is a internal struct, only get ring/mempool
> name.
> > and check.
> > 3. update dump_devargs case. update get pci address from portsInfo
> >
> > Signed-off-by: xu,huilong <huilongx.xu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_dump.py | 38 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> ----
> > -----
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_dump.py
> > b/tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_dump.py
> > index afdc256..26299f0 100644
> > --- a/tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_dump.py
> > +++ b/tests/TestSuite_unit_tests_dump.py
> > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ class TestUnitTestsDump(TestCase):
> > """
> > pass
> >
> > - def test_log_dump(self):
> > + def discard_test_log_dump(self):
> > """
> > Run history log dump test case.
> > """
> > @@ -86,40 +86,31 @@ class TestUnitTestsDump(TestCase):
> > Run history log dump test case.
> > """
> > self.dut.send_expect("./%s/app/test -n 1 -c ffff" %
> (self.target),
> > "R.*T.*E.*>.*>", self.start_test_time)
> > + self.dut.send_expect("mempool_autotest", "RTE>>",
> > self.run_cmd_time * 2)
> > out = self.dut.send_expect("dump_ring", "RTE>>",
> > self.run_cmd_time)
> > self.dut.send_expect("quit", "# ")
> > - elements = ['ring', 'address', 'flags', 'size', 'ct', 'ch',
> 'pt',
> > 'ph', 'used', 'avail', 'watermark']
> > + elements = ['ring', 'flags', 'size', 'ct', 'ch', 'pt', 'ph',
> > 'used', 'avail', 'watermark']
> > match_regex = "ring <(.*?)>@0x(.*)\r\n"
> > - for element in elements[2:]:
> > - match_regex += " %s=(\d*)\r\n" % element
> > m = re.compile(r"%s" % match_regex, re.S)
> > result = m.search(out)
> > - ring_info = dict(zip(elements, result.groups()))
> > + ring_info = result.groups()
> >
> > - self.verify(ring_info['ring'] == 'MP_log_history', "Test
> failed")
> > + self.verify(len(ring_info) == 2, "dump ring name failed")
> >
> Only check ring number is not enough, we'd better also check expected
> ring name.
The ring name only a string. The string content set by who will used it.
So I think we don't need check the string content. We only should check dump can work, and get ring struct info.
And the struct content by dpdk decision.
>
> > def test_mempool_dump(self):
> > """
> > Run mempool dump test case.
> > """
> > self.dut.send_expect("./%s/app/test -n 1 -c ffff" %
> (self.target),
> > "R.*T.*E.*>.*>", self.start_test_time)
> > + self.dut.send_expect("mempool_autotest", "RTE>>",
> > self.run_cmd_time * 2)
> > out = self.dut.send_expect("dump_mempool", "RTE>>",
> > self.run_cmd_time * 2)
> > self.dut.send_expect("quit", "# ")
> > - elements = ['mempool', 'flags', 'ring', 'phys_addr',
> > 'nb_mem_chunks', 'size', 'populated_size', 'header_size', 'elt_size',
> > - 'trailer_size', 'total_obj_size',
> 'private_data_size',
> > 'avg bytes/object', 'cache infos','cache_size', 'common_pool_count']
> > match_regex = "mempool <(.*?)>@0x(.*?)\r\n"
> > - for element in elements[1:]:
> > - if element == 'cache_size':
> > - match_regex += " %s=(.*?)\r\n" % element
> > - elif element == 'cache infos':
> > - match_regex += " %s:\r\n" % element
> > - else:
> > - match_regex += " %s=(.*?)\r\n" % element
> > m = re.compile(r"%s" % match_regex, re.S)
> > result = m.search(out)
> > - mempool_info = dict(zip(elements, result.groups()))
> > + mempool_info = result.groups()
> >
> > - self.verify(mempool_info['mempool'] == 'log_history', "Test
> > failed")
> > + self.verify(len(mempool_info) == 2, "dump mempool name
> failed")
> >
> > def test_physmem_dump(self):
> > """
> > @@ -185,19 +176,22 @@ class TestUnitTestsDump(TestCase):
> > Run devargs dump test case.
> > """
> > test_port = self.dut_ports[0]
> > - self.dut.send_expect("./%s/app/test -n 1 -c ffff -b %s"
> > - % (self.target,
> > self.dut.ports_info[test_port]['pci']), "R.*T.*E.*>.*>",
> > self.start_test_time)
> > + pci_address = self.dut.ports_info[test_port]['pci'];
> > + if not pci_address.startswith('0000:'):
> > + pci_address = '0000:' + pci_address
> > + self.dut.send_expect("./%s/app/test -n 1 -c ffff -b %s"
> > + % (self.target, pci_address),
>
> pci_address should be correct, framework has been added domain id into
> pci address.
OK, I will remove pci_address check code.
>
>
> > "R.*T.*E.*>.*>", self.start_test_time)
> > out = self.dut.send_expect("dump_devargs", "RTE>>",
> > self.run_cmd_time * 2)
> > self.dut.send_expect("quit", "# ")
> > - black_str = "PCI blacklist %s" %
> > self.dut.ports_info[test_port]['pci']
> > + black_str = "PCI blacklist %s" % pci_address
> > self.verify(black_str in out, "Dump black list failed")
> >
> > self.dut.send_expect("./%s/app/test -n 1 -c ffff -w %s"
> > - % (self.target,
> > self.dut.ports_info[test_port]['pci']), "R.*T.*E.*>.*>",
> > self.start_test_time)
> > + % (self.target, pci_address),
> > "R.*T.*E.*>.*>", self.start_test_time)
> > out = self.dut.send_expect("dump_devargs", "RTE>>",
> > self.run_cmd_time * 2)
> > self.dut.send_expect("quit", "# ")
> >
> > - white_str = "PCI whitelist %s" %
> > self.dut.ports_info[test_port]['pci']
> > + white_str = "PCI whitelist %s" % pci_address
> > self.verify(white_str in out, "Dump white list failed")
> >
> > def tear_down(self):
> > --
> > 1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-09 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-08 8:11 xu,huilong
2016-08-09 5:14 ` Liu, Yong
2016-08-09 5:47 ` Xu, HuilongX [this message]
2016-08-09 9:56 ` Liu, Yong
2016-08-10 7:50 ` Xu, HuilongX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DF2A19295B96364286FEB7F3DDA27A4637B9096F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=huilongx.xu@intel.com \
--cc=dts@dpdk.org \
--cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).