From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38F2A052A; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:29:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC48F90; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:29:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4B22AB for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:29:49 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: /3v0Ufc8mS4gTsvYexGOoRRMH9cH81NgeI5M6M8ymD+bHNQpnYSKIuaInDL9urKS3BEM8/Wka+ YdkyZ55GI0/w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9801"; a="170197286" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,468,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="170197286" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Nov 2020 19:29:47 -0800 IronPort-SDR: I/vTK1EIcG36NOy68IHY2gUJEwvAcavAozAu8hrm868GwDCe9xw4e+CPTq0L7bJKdXx65kQ/B6 E8j0zdCoCmvA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,468,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="366092261" Received: from fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.83]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2020 19:29:47 -0800 Received: from shsmsx604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) by fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:29:47 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:29:45 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:29:45 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Fu, Qi" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Fu, Qi" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1]test_plans/cvl_advanced_rss_gtpu_test_plan:update GTPPDUSessionContainer layer and some steps Thread-Index: AQHWsnb6L0eNAcq6skuEBvth1SjScanCUNCw Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:29:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20201104153531.21975-1-qi.fu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201104153531.21975-1-qi.fu@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1]test_plans/cvl_advanced_rss_gtpu_test_plan:update GTPPDUSessionContainer layer and some steps X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > 1. use the scapy layer GTPPDUSessionContainer instead of local layer > GTP_PDUSession_ExtensionHeader in gtpu test plan. > 2. fix typo in Subcase: toeplitz/symmetric with same pattern (switched ru= le > order) > 3. modify expected result in Subcase: toeplitz/symmetric with different > pattern (with/without UL/DL) > as code changing. >=20 > Signed-off-by: qifu Applied