From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8910CA04C7; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:36:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AD01BE8E; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:36:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F213160 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:36:05 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: Hcb2QexTUET97d7/iDLikSXxFO+hgf2Uk1wdLDub7NRSRezWkjotpVg5j/RHXTemzY/hKHbo3U kflK1cS257Mw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9744"; a="160154212" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,429,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="160154212" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Sep 2020 01:36:04 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 8jUS0BT+JXjCKmh0bIk2ZU+qTv31nkoBmT6IzMdh+CC+zyFIqq/asuRsceoZ0eWiwWaCEqmWYD Do7/zRjHtX/w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,429,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="345737802" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2020 01:36:04 -0700 Received: from shsmsx603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:36:03 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX603.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:36:01 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:36:01 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Ma, LihongX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Ma, LihongX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1] framework/main: use safer methods instead of unsafe methods Thread-Index: AQHWh+MNfOyFhah5NkqvVqI4JOSXfKlpZqmA Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:36:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1599763995-937-1-git-send-email-lihongx.ma@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1599763995-937-1-git-send-email-lihongx.ma@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] framework/main: use safer methods instead of unsafe methods X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] framework/main: use safer methods instead of un= safe > methods >=20 > it is unsafe to call a system command or execute an external program with= user > input, so use the safer method instead of it. >=20 > Signed-off-by: LihongX Ma Applied