DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@linux.intel.com>
To: Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/memif: zero-copy slave
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:44:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e037e60d-0d29-8849-8dbe-c24a08b85613@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190822081833.11203-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com>

On 8/22/2019 9:18 AM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> Zero-copy slave support for memif PMD.
> Slave interface exposes DPDK memory to
> master interface. Only single file segments
> are supported (EAL option --single-file-segments).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com>

Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

Since bind() issue solved, we can continue with the patch.

<...>

> @@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ struct pmd_process_private {
>   * @param proc_private
>   *   device process private data
>   */
> -void memif_free_regions(struct pmd_process_private *proc_private);
> +void memif_free_regions(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> 
>  /**
>   * Finalize connection establishment process. Map shared memory file
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mcfg.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mcfg.c
> index 066549432..03d9d472d 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mcfg.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mcfg.c
> @@ -161,3 +161,10 @@ rte_mcfg_timer_unlock(void)
>  	struct rte_mem_config *mcfg = rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config;
>  	rte_spinlock_unlock(&mcfg->tlock);
>  }
> +
> +uint32_t
> +rte_mcfg_get_single_file_segments(void)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mem_config *mcfg = rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config;
> +	return mcfg->single_file_segments;
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h
> index 34b0e44a0..9bb4a57f8 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h
> @@ -109,6 +109,16 @@ __rte_experimental
>  void
>  rte_mcfg_timer_unlock(void);
> 
> +/**
> + * @warning
> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> + *
> + * Get the single_file_segments parameter value from memory configuration.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +uint32_t
> +rte_mcfg_get_single_file_segments(void);
> +
>  #ifdef __cplusplus
>  }
>  #endif
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> index 7cbf82d37..c2b9d473f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
> @@ -418,5 +418,6 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>  	rte_lcore_to_cpu_id;
>  	rte_mcfg_timer_lock;
>  	rte_mcfg_timer_unlock;
> +	rte_mcfg_get_single_file_segments;

This should be moved to 19.11 block in experimental

cc'ed Dave for eal part,
@Dave, change looks straight forward but can you please check/comment?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-25 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-09  8:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-07-10 15:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-07-23 12:35   ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-08-22  8:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-10-04 13:23   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-15 16:59     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-17 11:52       ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-10-17 16:04         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-17 16:45           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-21 16:07             ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-25 16:44   ` Yigit, Ferruh [this message]
2019-10-29 14:28     ` David Marchand
2019-10-30 10:17       ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)
2019-10-30 10:25         ` David Marchand
2019-11-04 11:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Jakub Grajciar
2019-11-11 15:21     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-11 15:24       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-12 12:55         ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)
2019-11-11 15:49       ` David Marchand
2019-11-15 16:55         ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e037e60d-0d29-8849-8dbe-c24a08b85613@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jgrajcia@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).