DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce ABI change for mbuf structure
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:04:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e765c1a4-4f98-b26f-c4c9-d693951b2569@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160719144018.GA10912@bricha3-MOBL3>

Hi Bruce,

On 07/19/2016 04:40 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
>> For 16.11, the mbuf structure will be modified implying ABI breakage.
>> Some discussions already took place here:
>> http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/12878/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>> ---
>>  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 6 ++++++
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
>> index f502f86..2245bc2 100644
>> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
>> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
>> @@ -41,3 +41,9 @@ Deprecation Notices
>>  * The mempool functions for single/multi producer/consumer are deprecated and
>>    will be removed in 16.11.
>>    It is replaced by rte_mempool_generic_get/put functions.
>> +
>> +* ABI changes are planned for 16.11 in the ``rte_mbuf`` structure: some
>> +  fields will be reordered to facilitate the writing of ``data_off``,
>> +  ``refcnt``, and ``nb_segs`` in one operation. Indeed, some platforms
>> +  have an overhead if the store address is not naturally aligned. The
>> +  useless ``port`` field will also be removed at the same occasion.
>> -- 
> 
> Have we fully bottomed out on the mbuf changes. I'm not sure that once patches
> start getting considered for merge, new opinions may come forward. For instance,
> is the "port" field really "useless"?
> 
> Would it not be better to put in a less specific deprecation notice? What happens
> if this notice goes in and the final changes are different from those called out
> here?

Yes, you are right. What about the following text?

ABI changes are planned for 16.11 in the ``rte_mbuf`` structure: some
fields may be reordered to facilitate the writing of ``data_off``,
``refcnt``, and ``nb_segs`` in one operation. Indeed, some platforms
have an overhead if the store address is not naturally aligned. The
``port`` field may also be removed at the same occasion.


Thanks,
Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-19 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-19 14:01 Olivier Matz
2016-07-19 14:40 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-07-19 15:04   ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-07-19 15:07     ` Richardson, Bruce
2016-07-19 15:28       ` Olivier Matz
2016-07-20  7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2016-07-20  8:54   ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-27  8:33   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-28 18:04     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-27  9:34   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-07-28  2:35   ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-07-28  2:39   ` Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e765c1a4-4f98-b26f-c4c9-d693951b2569@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).