From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net: do fragmented headers check in non-debug build as well
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 01:53:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1fade2d-270a-238c-743f-4b98b8ab0c02@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1594650154-31408-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com>
On 7/13/2020 3:22 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> Pseudo-header checksum calculation requires contiguous headers.
> There is no any formal requirements on data location and mbuf
> structure which could be used by the application.
>
> Since
>
> commit dfc6b2fd8da3 ("mbuf: remove Intel offload checks from generic API")
>
> fragmented headers checks are done inside
> rte_net_intel_cksum_flags_prepare() in RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG build
> because it is moved from rte_validate_tx_offload() which is called
> under debug only.
>
> Make corresponding check to be done in non-debug build as well
> to avoid bad accesses, incorrect checksum calculation and to
> return appropriate error from Tx prepare.
>
> Make no-offloads check more precise and do it in non-debug build
> as well to avoid contiguous headers check and Tx prepare failure
> if it is not actually required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 14:32 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Andrew Rybchenko
2020-07-13 13:35 ` Olivier Matz
2020-07-13 14:22 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-07-13 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Andrew Rybchenko
2020-07-21 0:53 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1fade2d-270a-238c-743f-4b98b8ab0c02@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).