DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: zhoumin <zhoumin@loongson.cn>
Cc: ci@dpdk.org,  msantana@redhat.com,  dmarchan@redhat.com,
	thomas@monjalon.net,  probb@iol.unh.edu,  dceara@redhat.com,
	alialnu@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] tools: fix parsing message-id in the headers of email
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:53:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7tv892s1p8.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6814760d-e5b3-5d70-7fd2-58137038dd81@loongson.cn> (zhoumin@loongson.cn's message of "Fri, 8 Dec 2023 03:53:08 +0000")

zhoumin <zhoumin@loongson.cn> writes:

> Hi Aaron,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> On Thur, Dec 7, 2023 7:07PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> Min Zhou <zhoumin@loongson.cn> writes:
>>
>>> Some email has the message-id header named "Message-id", like this:
>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20230930010024.34377-1-rdna@apple.com/.
>>> So add the parsing for this kind of email.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Min Zhou <zhoumin@loongson.cn>
>>> ---
>> Hi Min,
>>
>> I wonder - we will keep having this issue of these header fields being
>> incorrectly matched based on case issues.
>>
>> Maybe we should make getheader have the ability to ignore case, or pass
>> something like Message-[iI][dD] as the header argument.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> Yes, making getheader have the ability to ignore case is simple and
> does work for this case as following:
>
> diff --git a/tools/parse-email.sh b/tools/parse-email.sh
> index 9ab627b..1e3008a 100755
> --- a/tools/parse-email.sh
> +++ b/tools/parse-email.sh
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ fi
>
>  getheader () # <header_name> <email_file>
>  {
> -       sed "/^$1: */!d;s///;N;s,\n[[:space:]]\+, ,;s,\n.*,,;q" "$2" |
> +       sed "/^$1: */I!d;s///;N;s,\n[[:space:]]\+, ,;s,\n.*,,;q" "$2" |
>         sed 's,",\\",g'
>
>  }
>
> But, I think we might get a false-positive when matching header field
> by this way. Because we are handling the whole patch file which could
> have same words in somewhere if we ignore the case.
>
> Passing Message-[iI][dD] also works for this case and I tend to use
> this method. What do you think? If you agree with this method I will
> send the V2 patch.

ACK by me - sounds good.  That means we can just modify the existing
getheader check for message id.

> Best regards,
>
> Min
>
>
>>>   tools/parse-email.sh | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/parse-email.sh b/tools/parse-email.sh
>>> index 9cb9583..fbe038a 100755
>>> --- a/tools/parse-email.sh
>>> +++ b/tools/parse-email.sh
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ subject=$(getheader Subject "$1")
>>>   from=$(getheader From "$1")
>>>   msgid=$(getheader Message-Id "$1")
>>>   [ -n "$msgid" ] || msgid=$(getheader Message-ID "$1")
>>> +[ -n "$msgid" ] || msgid=$(getheader Message-id "$1")
>>>   pwid=$(getheader X-Patchwork-Id "$1")
>>>   listid=$(getheader List-Id "$1")
>>>   reply=$(getheader In-Reply-To "$1")


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-13 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-04  2:52 Min Zhou
2023-12-07 19:07 ` Aaron Conole
2023-12-08  3:53   ` zhoumin
2023-12-13 12:53     ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2023-12-14  2:36       ` zhoumin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7tv892s1p8.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dceara@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=msantana@redhat.com \
    --cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=zhoumin@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).