DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: santosh <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>,
	ferruh.yigit@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/dpaa: fix memory allocation during bus scan
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 22:25:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8f5cf4c-cda8-440d-49e2-93c72fe4bd50@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1821646.02OIGBtUFx@xps>


On Tuesday 10 October 2017 09:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 10/10/2017 16:05, santosh:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On Tuesday 10 October 2017 01:09 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 10/10/2017 09:01, Shreyansh Jain:
>>>> Fixes: 5b22cf744689 ("bus/dpaa: introducing FMan configurations")
>>>> Fixes: 37f9b54bd3cf ("net/dpaa: support Tx and Rx queue setup")
>>> These lines should appear after the explanation.
>>>
>>>> Cc: shreyansh.jain@nxp.com
>>>>
>>>> With the IOVA auto detection changes, bus scan is performed before
>>>> memory initialization. DPAA bus scan must not use rte_malloc in
>>>> its path.
>>> If the scan has been broken by IOVA detection, you should reference
>>> IOVA in Fixes line, not DPAA.
>>>
>> hmm.. IOVA not breaking scanning!, Refer this [1].
> It is breaking. A break is a behaviour or interface change.
> When moving init order, you break behaviour.
> I don't say it is bad.
> I say only it is the primary cause of this change.

disagree!. Why so: Legacy PCI/bus scan implementation don't
use rte_ lib as they don;t need to.. Refer [1] for detailing.
However, dpaa is and that we agree to align with legacy.
So its a open question : Who fixes who?

> The Fixes: line is also a help when backporting patches.
> This patch needs to be backported only if IOVA patch is also backported.

IMO, would prefer backport: rather fixes: tag in above case, more verbose I guess.

>> We(me/hemant) has discussed about same on thread[1] and agreed to
>> do respective changes and remove rte_ memory dependency from code base
>> at scan time..
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> [1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/26764/
> You already discussed about this issue, fine.
>
> Santosh, as you insist to talk again about it, one more comment:
>
> It is very good to have discussions on the mailing list.

Thanks, That makes me think that I didn't break, indeed did what was needed in agnostic way.

> It would be perfect if all these informations were explicitly given
> in the commit messages.
> For instance, saying that the scan cannot use rte_malloc anymore is
> a valuable tip for other developpers.

Agree, but scan wasn;t using for PCI/bus case.. so one can;t be sure whether to
mention or not..

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-10 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-10  7:01 Shreyansh Jain
2017-10-10  7:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-10  9:19   ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-10-10 14:05   ` santosh
2017-10-10 16:17     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-10 16:55       ` santosh [this message]
2017-10-11  5:17         ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-10-11  5:23           ` santosh
2017-10-10  9:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Shreyansh Jain
2017-10-10 13:13   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8f5cf4c-cda8-440d-49e2-93c72fe4bd50@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).