DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] doc: add deprecation marker usage
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:40:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb1ee35d-8360-c2c5-a15d-531b945142dd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190301173250.80930-3-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

On 01/03/2019 17:32, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> Define '__rte_deprecated' usage process.
> 
> Suggests keeping old API with '__rte_deprecated' marker including
> next LTS, they will be removed just after the LTS release.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> ---
> Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> Cc: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> Cc: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> 
> v2:
> * Rephrased as commented
> 
> v3:
> * changed when to remove the deprecated API. It is now just after
> an LTS release, the motivation is to keep changes small in LTS.
> Based on techboard discussion:
> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-January/123519.html
> 
> v4:
> change working around 'active':
> s/active/non-experimental/
> s/become active/be able to replace old API
> 
> v5:
> Grammar fix
> Rephrase API removal reminder
> ---
>  doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
> index 2fcb8bafd..30f8735ba 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
> @@ -125,6 +125,15 @@ added to the Release Notes:
>    these changes. Binaries using this library built prior to version 2.1 will
>    require updating and recompilation.
>  
> +New API replacing previous one
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +If a new API proposed functionally replaces an existing one, when the new API
> +becomes non-experimental then the old one is marked with ``__rte_deprecated``.
> +Deprecated APIs are removed completely just after the next LTS.
> +
> +Reminder that old API should follow deprecation process to be removed.
> +
>  
>  Experimental APIs
>  -----------------
> 

Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>

for series, again :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-01 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-19 12:52 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/2] doc: clean ABI/API policy guide Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-19 12:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/2] doc: add deprecation marker usage Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-20  8:02   ` Luca Boccassi
2018-12-21 15:52     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-20  8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/2] doc: clean ABI/API policy guide Luca Boccassi
2018-12-20  8:03 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-12-21 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-21 15:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] doc: add deprecation marker usage Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-22 16:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] doc: clean ABI/API policy guide Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-22 16:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] doc: make RTE_NEXT_ABI optional Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-22 16:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc: add deprecation marker usage Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-23 23:07       ` Kevin Traynor
2019-01-24 14:31         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-24 15:33           ` Kevin Traynor
2019-01-24 16:29             ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-23  8:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] doc: clean ABI/API policy guide Neil Horman
2019-01-24 18:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-24 18:10       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] doc: make RTE_NEXT_ABI optional Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-31 17:18         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-24 18:10       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] doc: add deprecation marker usage Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-31 17:17         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-02-01 17:06           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-01 16:46             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-31 17:46       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] doc: clean ABI/API policy guide Kevin Traynor
2019-03-01 17:32       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-01 17:32         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] doc: make RTE_NEXT_ABI optional Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-01 17:32         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] doc: add deprecation marker usage Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-01 17:40           ` Kevin Traynor [this message]
2019-03-27 13:29             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-27 13:29               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb1ee35d-8360-c2c5-a15d-531b945142dd@redhat.com \
    --to=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).